2022
DOI: 10.1021/acssuschemeng.2c02743
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate-Promoted Higher Alcohol Synthesis from CO2 Hydrogenation

Abstract: Sulfur is usually regarded as a catalyst poison for many industrial reactions. Since an increasing number of studies have also reported that sulfate can serve as a promoter for certain reactions, the effects of sulfate on catalysts should be critically treated. Herein, we report a promotion effect of sulfate species on higher alcohol synthesis (HAS) from CO2 hydrogenation over a typical KCuFe-based catalyst. It is found that sulfate modification can regulate the hydrogenation capacity and balance of CO dissoci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As shown in Figures a–d, *CO 3 2– (1515, 1429, and 1268 cm –1 ) appears on both catalysts’ surfaces after the reaction gas is introduced, , which means that CO 2 is adsorbed on the catalyst surface. Several peaks attributed to *HCOO (2931, 2835–2866, 1593–1622, and 1340–1394 cm –1 ) species also appear, suggesting that *CO 3 2– hydrogenates with H 2 on the catalyst surface. Simultaneously, *CO (2075 cm –1 ), gaseous CO (2050–2220 cm –1 ), , and gaseous CH 4 (3014 cm –1 ) appear, , indicating that CO 2 –FTS reactions with CO as an intermediate occurred on the surface of both catalysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Figures a–d, *CO 3 2– (1515, 1429, and 1268 cm –1 ) appears on both catalysts’ surfaces after the reaction gas is introduced, , which means that CO 2 is adsorbed on the catalyst surface. Several peaks attributed to *HCOO (2931, 2835–2866, 1593–1622, and 1340–1394 cm –1 ) species also appear, suggesting that *CO 3 2– hydrogenates with H 2 on the catalyst surface. Simultaneously, *CO (2075 cm –1 ), gaseous CO (2050–2220 cm –1 ), , and gaseous CH 4 (3014 cm –1 ) appear, , indicating that CO 2 –FTS reactions with CO as an intermediate occurred on the surface of both catalysts.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dynamic IR peak intensities are shown in Figures and S17. The signal of C 2 H 5 O* over the 0.3K-1Pd/Fe 2 O 3 catalyst increases rapidly with time, and the ratio of CH x * to CO is significantly weakened with a weak CH x * signal compared with 1Pd/Fe 2 O 3 , indicating that the addition of highly dispersed K (0.3 wt %) inhibits the hydrogenation of the CH x * species and increases the ratio of CO*/CH x * on the catalyst surface, which promotes CO insertion . For the 0.3K/Fe 2 O 3 catalyst, CO is the main product with a small amount of C 2 H 5 O*, and the introduction of 1% Pd increases the C 2 H 5 O* formation rate (Figure c).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Catalytic CO 2 hydrogenation has gained significant attention as a credible scientific approach to counter these global challenges. , This method transforms CO 2 into useful energy fuels and chemicals, including carbon monoxide (CO), methane (CH 4 ), and light olefins . Beyond addressing atmospheric CO 2 accumulation, it heralds a path to a sustainable hydrocarbon-based energy future, promoting a more balanced global carbon footprint. , Nevertheless, this vision is not without hurdles . The inherent thermodynamic stability of CO 2 complicates its direct conversion to energy fuels and chemicals, particularly under milder pressure and temperature .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%