2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0967-0637(01)00007-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfate reduction and anaerobic methane oxidation in Black Sea sediments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

19
156
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 239 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
19
156
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…While AOM is thus generally coupled to SO 4 2À reduction (SDMO) in marine waters and sediments (e.g. Iversen and Jørgensen, 1985;Boetius et al, 2000;Jørgensen et al, 2001), other electron acceptors of AOM have been much less frequently studied in freshwater systems. Due to low the SO 4 2À concentrations usually observed in freshwaters environments, AOM is often considered to be negligible compared to aerobic CH 4 oxidation (Rudd et al, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While AOM is thus generally coupled to SO 4 2À reduction (SDMO) in marine waters and sediments (e.g. Iversen and Jørgensen, 1985;Boetius et al, 2000;Jørgensen et al, 2001), other electron acceptors of AOM have been much less frequently studied in freshwater systems. Due to low the SO 4 2À concentrations usually observed in freshwaters environments, AOM is often considered to be negligible compared to aerobic CH 4 oxidation (Rudd et al, 1974).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14]). Concentration and oxidation rate measurements of CH 4 dissolved in the water column and sediments [1][2][3][4][5][6] have been used to assemble CH 4 geochemical budgets for the entire Black Sea [1] and the north-western shelf [5]. These studies indicate that the Black Sea is the largest surface water reservoir of dissolved CH 4 (96 Tg) of which 0.066 Tg yr − 1 are emitted into the atmosphere [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, they determined the flux of CH 4 from the shelf core to be 0.2 mol m − 2 yr − 1 leaving 86.7% of the balancing source flux not quantified [1]. Subsequent measurements of CH 4 concentration profiles in sediment cores [5,6] indicate that the diffusive flux of CH 4 from sediments to the water [47]. By convention [47], all radiocarbon results are normalized to 13 C. Samples were collected in the (○) central Black Sea water column in July 1988 [1,50] and (▴) western Black Sea water column in May 2001.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, even showing high slope in sulfate profile in this depth, the geochemical data showed high concentration of methane (around 20,000 ppm) and gas hydrate formation (PC51).The methane profile is crossing the SMI, which suggests that the AOM does not consume all the available methane migrating through the zone of major AOM activity (Knab et al 2009, Reeburgh et al 1991, Jørgensen et al 2001, Hensen et al2003. AOM of this type, having such methane-tailing profiles, is referred as "sluggish" and it is generally associated with variable methane flux rates (Jørgensen et al2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It remains unclear why the microorganisms cannot bring down the substrate concentrations further and shorten the lifetime of coexisting methane and sulfate. Little is known about their limiting the efficiency of the anaerobic methane oxidizing microorganisms (Jørgensen et al 2001). Since the gradients have not significantly smoothed, the event at PC51 and PC53 has probably occurred very recently like a magnitude of the mass (re-)movements, for example.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%