“…evaporitic sulfates and carbonate-associated sulfate (e.g., Kampschulte and Strauss, 2004), and (iv) highly variable, yet frequently negative ı 34 S values in sedimentary sulfides attributed to biological sulfur cycling, notably bacterial sulfate reduction (e.g., Strauss, 1997;Canfield, 2001). Considering respective observations and underlying systematics of sulfur isotopic fractionation (reviewed, e.g., in Canfield and Raiswell, 1999;Johnston, 2011), the sedimentary records of Archean ı 34 S sulfate and ı 34 S sulfide have been regarded as generally reflecting (i) a low-sulfate ocean (Habicht et al, 2002;Crowe et al, 2014), whereas (ii) controversial views exist with respect to an early activity of biological sulfur cycling. Notably, the absence of consistently sizeable fractionations in 34 S has been regarded as evidence for a limited importance of biological sulfur cycling in Archean sedimentary surface environments (e.g., Strauss et al, 2003), despite individual reports of highly 34 S-depleted pyrite in Paleoarchean sedimentary rocks (e.g., Ohmoto et al, 1993;Shen et al, 2001Shen et al, , 2009Philippot et al, 2007;Wu and Farquhar, 2013) and the notion from molecular biology that bacterial sulfate reduction represents an ancient metabolic pathway (Shen and Buick, 2004;Blumenberg et al, 2006;Philippot et al, 2007;Ueno et al, 2008;Shen et al, 2009;Johnston, 2011).…”