2018
DOI: 10.1039/c7en01205e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfidation of nanoscale zerovalent iron in the presence of two organic macromolecules and its effects on trichloroethene degradation

Abstract: Sulfidation of nanoscale zerovalent iron (NZVI) enhances its reactivity to chlorinated organic contaminants such as trichloroethene (TCE).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Anionic polyelectrolytes are preferred because they provide both electrostatic and steric interparticle repulsion, as well as lower deposition on subsurface collector surfaces which tend to be negatively charged. , Therefore, the high molecular weight and high densities of charged functional groups make polymers like CMC ideal . The stabilizing agent can be applied by introducing the polymer before the reducing agent is added (presynthesis stabilization) or by physical adsorption to the existing nZVI particles (postsynthesis stabilization). , This distinction is important as the mode of application will affect the stability and reactivity. ,, …”
Section: Synthesis Methods and Its Impacts On S-nzvi Composition And ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Anionic polyelectrolytes are preferred because they provide both electrostatic and steric interparticle repulsion, as well as lower deposition on subsurface collector surfaces which tend to be negatively charged. , Therefore, the high molecular weight and high densities of charged functional groups make polymers like CMC ideal . The stabilizing agent can be applied by introducing the polymer before the reducing agent is added (presynthesis stabilization) or by physical adsorption to the existing nZVI particles (postsynthesis stabilization). , This distinction is important as the mode of application will affect the stability and reactivity. ,, …”
Section: Synthesis Methods and Its Impacts On S-nzvi Composition And ...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The S to Fe ratio associated with the particle (i.e., [S/Fe] particle ), has been recognized to be more closely related to the reactivity of S-(n)­ZVI for TCE than the dosed value during synthesis (i.e., [S/Fe] dosed ), although limited data is available. , For example, the reactivity of S-nZVI synthesized using the two-step method with Na 2 S to TCE only increases with [S/Fe] dosed to a certain point, because incorporation of FeS on nZVI surface becomes difficult at higher [S/Fe] dosed . ,,, In comparison, Bhattacharjee and Ghoshal reported that the reactivity of S-nZVI to TCE increases with [S/Fe] particle from 0.035 to 0.4, where the nanoparticles were synthesized using the one-step method with Na 2 S and the [S/Fe] dosed equals [S/Fe] particle . This may explain the lack of correlation of R with the optimal [S/Fe] dosed of S-(n)­ZVI obtained from the two-step method where relatively limited sulfur loading on the particle is achievable, but significant correlation of R with the optimal [S/Fe] dosed is found for those from one-step synthesis using Na 2 S 2 O 4 ( p < 0.05) where higher extent of sulfur loading is observed (SI Figure S2).…”
Section: Contaminant Transformationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Doong and Lai (2006) have also studied the effect of metal ions in the absence and the presence of humic acid, with a decrease of constant rates in the presence of humic acid (Table 6.17). Generally, the presence of macromolecules, which are abundant in the subsurface, results in a decrease in iron reactivity due to the blocking of reactive site through adsorption, complexation or a combination of both (Bhattacharjee et al 2016;Bhattacharjee and Ghoshal 2018b).…”
Section: Medium Compositionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the removal of chlorinated organic solvents, which can deeply penetrate aquifers, accumulating in the sub-surface as lenses of highly hazardous and toxic pollutants [1,2] from groundwater and soil, has become a major problem. Many laboratory-as well as field-scale studies exist considering different reaction pathways between reactants and the target contaminant, such as immobilization of contaminants [3][4][5][6][7][8][9] or in situ degradation of target contaminants into less hazardous or even non-hazardous substances [10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Thereby, a major difficulty is the monitoring of reactants during the injection and after secondary mobilisation by groundwater flow.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%