1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1996.tb00340.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfide-induced dissimilatory nitrate reduction to ammonia in anaerobic freshwater sediments

Abstract: Different reduced sulfur compounds (H2S, FeS, S2O32−) were tested as electron donors for dissimilatory nitrate reduction in nitrate‐amended sediment slurries. Only in the free sulfide‐enriched slurries was nitrate appreciably reduced to ammonia (), with concomitant oxidation of sulfide to S0 (). The initial concentration of free sulfide appears as a factor determining the type of nitrate reduction. At extremely low concentrations of free S2− (metal sulfides) nitrate was reduced via denitrification whereas at h… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

13
210
3

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 349 publications
(226 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
13
210
3
Order By: Relevance
“…1) led to short turnover times for sulphate (2-5 days), and thus required rapid reoxidation of reduced sulphur species, as observed in other wetlands 10 . This reoxidation may have occurred in the uppermost mm of peat/sediment 24 , which were exposed to oxygenated bottom waters and to the atmosphere by diurnal tides at the site in Georgia, or via anaerobic oxidation coupled to nitrate 25 , oxidized trace metals 26 , humic substances 27 , or nanowires 28 , any of which could serve as electron sinks. Dissolved hydrogen sulphide (HS À ) concentrations were undetectable in Georgia and low (0.3-7.8 mM) in Maine and Florida ( Table 1), suggesting that HS À is either quickly reoxidized or scavenged via precipitation of reduced metal, likely iron 29 sulphides, as Fe oxides are abundant in these wetlands, especially in Georgia (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) led to short turnover times for sulphate (2-5 days), and thus required rapid reoxidation of reduced sulphur species, as observed in other wetlands 10 . This reoxidation may have occurred in the uppermost mm of peat/sediment 24 , which were exposed to oxygenated bottom waters and to the atmosphere by diurnal tides at the site in Georgia, or via anaerobic oxidation coupled to nitrate 25 , oxidized trace metals 26 , humic substances 27 , or nanowires 28 , any of which could serve as electron sinks. Dissolved hydrogen sulphide (HS À ) concentrations were undetectable in Georgia and low (0.3-7.8 mM) in Maine and Florida ( Table 1), suggesting that HS À is either quickly reoxidized or scavenged via precipitation of reduced metal, likely iron 29 sulphides, as Fe oxides are abundant in these wetlands, especially in Georgia (Supplementary Table 2).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulfide complexes can act electron donors for nitrogen respiration (e.g., denitrification [Brunet and Garcia-Gil, 1996;Haaijer et al, 2007;Burgin et al, 2012]), and nitrogen retention is high at TOWeR [Ardón et al, 2010], and loss of ammonium is related to salt water inputs at the outflow [Ardón et al, 2013]. Although N cycling is certainly affected by salt water incursion, the degree of connection between nitrogen, sulfur, and iron (e.g., FeS) transformations remains unknown [Burgin and Hamilton, 2007].…”
Section: Salt Water Controls On Iron and Sulfate Reduction Rates And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that sulfide can contribute as an electron donor for autotrophic denitrifying bacteria (Cytryn et al, 2005a;Cytryn et al, 2005b;Shao et al, 2010), certain concentrations of sulfide also inhibit the enzymes responsible for denitrification (Brunet and Garcia-Gil, 1996). Slower rates of nitrate reduction under high sulfide (as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Effects Of Sulfide On Nitrate Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a sulfide-rich environment has been hypothesized to favor DNRA (Brunet and Garcia-Gil, 1996;Sher et al, 2008), the presence of the DNRA process is to be expected in this system and should also be an important pathway for nitrate reduction. Apart from sulfide, the high C/N ratio is another factor that promotes the growth of DNRA bacteria (van Rijn et al, 2006;Schreier et al, 2010).…”
Section: Dnramentioning
confidence: 99%