2005
DOI: 10.1345/aph.1e350
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfonamide Cross-Reactivity: Fact or Fiction?

Abstract: After a thorough critique of the literature, it appears that the dogma of sulfonylarylamine cross-reactivity with non-sulfonylarylamines is not supported by the data. While many of the case reports on the surface support the concept of cross-reactivity, on closer examination the level of evidence in many of the cases does not conclusively support either a connection or an association between the observed cause and effect.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
54
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
4
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally, in an exhaustive review of all the relevant case reports from 1955 to Johnson et al (2005 concluded that, none of the drug pairs implicated during this 50-year period showed enough strength of association to establish the existence of sulfonamide cross-reactivity.…”
Section: Ajidmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Finally, in an exhaustive review of all the relevant case reports from 1955 to Johnson et al (2005 concluded that, none of the drug pairs implicated during this 50-year period showed enough strength of association to establish the existence of sulfonamide cross-reactivity.…”
Section: Ajidmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Based on these findings authors concluded that the risk of cross-reactivity between SA and celecoxib is low. Based on this review Johnson et al (2005) made the recommendation that patients with a sulfonylarylamine allergy can be administered medications from the other two groups with proper monitoring if it is not possible to use an unrelated product.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations