2017
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22081352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfonamide-Linked Ciprofloxacin, Sulfadiazine and Amantadine Derivatives as a Novel Class of Inhibitors of Jack Bean Urease; Synthesis, Kinetic Mechanism and Molecular Docking

Abstract: Sulfonamide derivatives serve as an important building blocks in the drug design discovery and development (4D) process. Ciprofloxacin-, sulfadiazine- and amantadine-based sulfonamides were synthesized as potent inhibitors of jack bean urease and free radical scavengers. Molecular diversity was explored and electronic factors were also examined. All 24 synthesized compounds exhibited excellent potential against urease enzyme. Compound 3e (IC50 = 0.081 ± 0.003 µM), 6a (IC50 = 0.0022 ± 0.0002 µM), 9e (IC50 = 0.0… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
20
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The other residues which are in close contact with the ligand structure are Glu642, Gly641, Arg639, Gln635 and His585. Literature data also ensured the importance of these residues in bonding with other urease inhibitors which strengthen our docking results [36,37]. The comparative binding energy and SAR analysis showed the significance of 5 f may consider as potent inhibitors by targeting jack bean urease.…”
Section: Ligand-binding Analysis Of Urease Docked Complexessupporting
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The other residues which are in close contact with the ligand structure are Glu642, Gly641, Arg639, Gln635 and His585. Literature data also ensured the importance of these residues in bonding with other urease inhibitors which strengthen our docking results [36,37]. The comparative binding energy and SAR analysis showed the significance of 5 f may consider as potent inhibitors by targeting jack bean urease.…”
Section: Ligand-binding Analysis Of Urease Docked Complexessupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The Jack bean urease activity was determined by measuring the amount of ammonia produced with indophenols method described [22][23][24]. The reaction mixtures, comprising 20 µL of enzyme (Jack bean urease, 5 U/mL) and 20 μL of compounds in 50 μL potassium phosphate buffer (100 mM urea, 10 mM K 2 HPO 4 , 1 mM EDTA and 10 mMLiCl, pH 8.2), were incubated for 30 min at 37 ºC in 96-well plate.…”
Section: In Vitro Urease Inhibitory Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The urease activity was determined by measuring ammonia production using the indophenol method, as reported previously. 17,18 The results (change in absorbance per min) were processed by using the SoMaxPro soware.…”
Section: Kinetic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The jack bean urease was used only as a surrogate because the human urease is highly expensive and is not feasible for such in vitro investigations. [16][17][18] Although the observed activity is the resultant of the whole molecule, a limited structure-activity relationship (SAR) was rationalized by analyzing the effect of different aryl moieties on the inhibitory potential. Fig.…”
Section: Urease Inhibition and Structure-activity Relationshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation