2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.gca.2019.11.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur extraction via carbonated melts from sulfide-bearing mantle lithologies – Implications for deep sulfur cycle and mantle redox

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
34
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 99 publications
4
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, melt saturation in CO 2 and S, as well as separation of CO 2 -rich fluids and sulfide liquids in the mantle, are necessarily restricted to low-degree melting regimes (<10%), and therefore alkaline mafic/ultramafic melts. The recent experimental work of Chowdury and Dasgupta 61 on the concentration of S at sulfide saturation in carbonate-rich silicate melts provides a potential theoretical framework in support of our hypothesis. Assimilation of silicate mantle wall rocks ubiquitously affect CO 2 -rich silicate magmas during their ascent through the lithospheric mantle 62 , 63 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As such, melt saturation in CO 2 and S, as well as separation of CO 2 -rich fluids and sulfide liquids in the mantle, are necessarily restricted to low-degree melting regimes (<10%), and therefore alkaline mafic/ultramafic melts. The recent experimental work of Chowdury and Dasgupta 61 on the concentration of S at sulfide saturation in carbonate-rich silicate melts provides a potential theoretical framework in support of our hypothesis. Assimilation of silicate mantle wall rocks ubiquitously affect CO 2 -rich silicate magmas during their ascent through the lithospheric mantle 62 , 63 .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 69%
“…At pressure ≥3.5 GPa (~100-110 km of depth), interaction of carbonate-rich melts and peridotite wall rocks (especially orthopyroxene) can drive out large amounts of CO 2 from ascending melts and generate CO 2 -rich supercritical fluids 64 . A large drop in CO 2 and related increase in SiO 2 contents above 35-40% largely decrease the solubility of reduced S and promotes the formation of immiscible sulfide melts 61 as well. What remains to be addressed is whether or not CO 2 -rich supercritical fluids and sulfide melts can remain physically connected during ascent once exsolved from their parental silicate magma.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the high Fe 3+ /ΣFe of nephelinites and alkaline basalts in eastern China strongly suggests that they originated from mantle sources which are more oxidized than the MORBs (average Fe 3+ /ΣFe = 0.16 ± 0.01; Cottrell & Kelley, 2011). Increasing f O2 can dramatically increase the sulfur content at sulfide saturation (SCSS) and thus enhance sulfide dissolution (Chowdhury & Dasgupta, 2020; Ding & Dasgupta, 2017; Jugo et al., 2010; Wallace & Carmichael, 1992). We envisage that in the presence of sulfide in mantle (either in crystalline or molten phase), silicate melts dissolve sulfide rapidly.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The α melt-Ol is set as 1.00015 according to the upper bound of α melt-Ol from Klaver et al (2020). Sulfur content at sulfide saturation (SCSS) model is from Chowdhury and Dasgupta (2020) and Jugo et al (2010). The basaltic melt composition used in SCSS calculation is from Gale et al (2013).…”
Section: Nickel Isotopic Variations In Mafic Lithologiesmentioning
confidence: 99%