2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.11.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur geochemistry of hydrothermal waters in Yellowstone National Park: IV Acid–sulfate waters

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

16
212
1
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 148 publications
(231 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
16
212
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Ballantyne and Moore (1988) pointed out, however, that such correlations should be examined with caution, since they reflect the common behavior of As and Cl in geothermal areas rather than common sources or chemical associations: Cl is generally derived from magmatic gaseous HCl, where as As is derived from host-rock leaching (Webster and Nordstrom, 2003). The San Antonio ratios suggest enrichment of As relative to Cl in SPR1-6, which has also been documented in Yellowstone National Park (Nordstrom et al, 2001), and was attributed to high CO 2 concentrations in the source waters. This may also be possible for SPR1-6, given their high HCO 3 concentrations (Table 1), although these may also at least partly be due to dilution with meteoric waters, as discussed above (Figure 2).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Spring Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ballantyne and Moore (1988) pointed out, however, that such correlations should be examined with caution, since they reflect the common behavior of As and Cl in geothermal areas rather than common sources or chemical associations: Cl is generally derived from magmatic gaseous HCl, where as As is derived from host-rock leaching (Webster and Nordstrom, 2003). The San Antonio ratios suggest enrichment of As relative to Cl in SPR1-6, which has also been documented in Yellowstone National Park (Nordstrom et al, 2001), and was attributed to high CO 2 concentrations in the source waters. This may also be possible for SPR1-6, given their high HCO 3 concentrations (Table 1), although these may also at least partly be due to dilution with meteoric waters, as discussed above (Figure 2).…”
Section: Characteristics Of Spring Watersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…and the Russian Kamchatkan peninsula (Eristalinus sepulchralis) [46,100]. Dipteran larvae are mostly found living in and feeding on bacterial mats within sulphide springs, and ephydrid and pyschodid adult flies have been observed feeding and reproducing on these mats as well [45,46,82,101]. Besides dipterans, the only other insects reported from sulphide springs are trichopterans (based on the presence of larval casings in Yellowstone) [101] and hemipterans of the genus Belostoma in Mexico [102].…”
Section: Macroinvertebrates In Sulphide Spring Environmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Temperature variation appears to be related in part to the geographic location of springs as well as the ultimate sources of H 2 S production. Sulphide springs are often also characterised by increased concentrations of bicarbonate, calcium sulphate, sodium chloride, and other ions (leading to substantial increases of specific conductivity [39]), and by lower pH likely caused by the presence of sulphuric acid from chemical and bacterial H 2 S oxidation (although pH reductions are dependent on the buffering capacity of the water in the region) [57,76,82]. Finally, upon the discharge of sulphidic water at the surface, H 2 S spontaneously oxidizes in water, causing and aggravating hypoxic conditions in aquatic systems [83,84].…”
Section: Freshwater Sulphide Springs: Occurrence and Environmental Vamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…So doing, we provide more theoretical and observational confirmation to our initial attempts to model magmatic gas scrubbing at Icelandic volcanoes and, even more importantly, extend these to higher-temperature hydrothermal interactions. The large mass of previous work on hydrothermal systems has clearly demonstrated that compositions of surface hydrothermal manifestations are controlled by a variety of processes, occurring at both deep reservoir conditions (e.g., fluid-mineral reactions; Giggenbach, 1981Giggenbach, , 1988Reed and Spycher, 1984;Arnórsson, 2000, 2002) and upon ascent of fluids from the reservoir to surface (e.g., boiling, degassing, mixing, oxidation and further water-rock interactions; Arnórsson, 1985;Arnórsson et al, 2007;Fournier, 1989;Kaasalainen and Stefánsson, 2012;Markússon and Stefánsson, 2011;Nordstrom et al, 2009). In comparison to these well characterised processes, the interaction mechanisms (scrubbing) of magmatic volatiles inside hydrothermal reservoirs have received less attention so far, and motivate the present study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%