2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2008.01.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur isotope ratio measurements of individual sulfate particles by NanoSIMS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
46
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…8c), a zone devoid of secondary ion signal appeared at the center of the silica surface. This was probably due to charging (Mueller et al, 2012) and/or to topographic heterogeneity (Winterholler et al, 2008). As silica was more resistant to polishing than the epoxy, silica surfaces were often convex (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8c), a zone devoid of secondary ion signal appeared at the center of the silica surface. This was probably due to charging (Mueller et al, 2012) and/or to topographic heterogeneity (Winterholler et al, 2008). As silica was more resistant to polishing than the epoxy, silica surfaces were often convex (Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Particles with a dry diameter > 5 µm (mineral dust) would be included in the cloud droplet residual fraction whether they were activated or not. The largest mineral dust particles -which could have erroneously been collected as "cloud droplet residuals" -were however not analysed, to prevent artefacts due to electrostatic charging, which would affect the correction of the instrumental mass fractionation during NanoSIMS analysis (Winterholler et al, 2008).…”
Section: E Harris Et Al: Cloud Processing During Hcct-2010mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3.6), not to calculate δ 34 S values. The use of this instrument to analyse sulfur isotope ratios in the isotope ratio analysis mode is described in detail in Winterholler et al (2006Winterholler et al ( , 2008 and analysis conditions similar to those used for the current study are given in Harris et al (2012b), so only a brief description will be included here.…”
Section: Nanosims Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations