1966
DOI: 10.2113/gsecongeo.61.8.1428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur isotopic method for discriminating between sulfates of hypogene and supergene origin

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
42
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
42
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of stable isotope data on alunite as a tool to distinguish different environments in fossil epithermal systems has been demonstrated in various studies (Field, 1966;Jensen et al, 1971;Bethke, 1984;Rye et al, 1988). The relation between the stable isotope ratios of alunite and the environment of formation of acid-sulfate alteration was recognized by Bethke et al, (1984) and the genetic process has been documented recently by Rye et al, (1988Rye et al, ( , 1989 in a comprehensive study of 16 epithermal systems worldwide (including the data presented here on Rodalquilar).…”
Section: Stable Isotope Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…The use of stable isotope data on alunite as a tool to distinguish different environments in fossil epithermal systems has been demonstrated in various studies (Field, 1966;Jensen et al, 1971;Bethke, 1984;Rye et al, 1988). The relation between the stable isotope ratios of alunite and the environment of formation of acid-sulfate alteration was recognized by Bethke et al, (1984) and the genetic process has been documented recently by Rye et al, (1988Rye et al, ( , 1989 in a comprehensive study of 16 epithermal systems worldwide (including the data presented here on Rodalquilar).…”
Section: Stable Isotope Geochemistrymentioning
confidence: 80%
“…Oxidation of sulfide minerals to sulfate at low temperatures is generally a quantitative and unidirectional process that causes negligible sulfur-isotope fractionation. This often results in d 34 S SO 4 values being indistinguishable from those of the parent sulfide minerals (Gavelin et al 1960;Nakai and Jensen 1964;Field 1966;Rye et al 1992;Balci et al 2007Balci et al , 2012. Because negligible and minor fractionation of S isotopes occurs during the oxidative weathering of sulfide minerals (Field 1966;Seal 2003;Balci et al 2007Balci et al , 2012, the d 34 S signature of dissolved SO 4 in the lakes should be similar to that of the sulfur source.…”
Section: Water Column and Sediments Of Amlmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various investigations indicated that the sulfur isotopic composition of cinnabar or stibnite in all of the mercury, antimony and gold deposits in the East Guizhou region, is homogeneous and rich in the heavy sulfur isotope 34 S, that is to say, the 8 34 S value in these deposits is always positive, ranging from 10 to 20 %o 8 34 S. These sulfur isotope values indicate that the sulfur has been derived from sedimentary rocks (e.g. : Brown, 1967, Field, 1966. ( ), Hua (1982 and Zhang(1983) These studies point out that the source of sulfur in the sulfide minerals in the Danzhai gold-mercury deposit is the host sedimentary rocks.…”
Section: Chapter Vi: Argon Isotope Investigation Of Quartz Associatedmentioning
confidence: 99%