2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpowsour.2018.08.045
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur redistribution between positive and negative electrodes of lithium-sulfur cells during cycling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…LSBs are considered a promising potential energy storage system for the future because of their evident advantages, including high energy and power density, environmental friendliness and low cost as a result of the sulfur-rich nature of Earth [1][2][3]. However, commercialization of LSBs has been impeded by low S utilization, a consequence of the shuttle effect of soluble lithium polysulfides, along with fast capacity decay and low electron conductivity of S/Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S, huge volume variation of active S upon lithiation, and corrosion of Li anodes [4][5][6][7]. In recent years, various strategies have been adopted to weaken the influence of the above issues and improve the electrochemical performance of LSBs, including modification of the separator [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the creation of new electrolytes [15][16][17][18], the addition of protection for the Li anode [19][20][21], and improvement of the sulfur host [22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LSBs are considered a promising potential energy storage system for the future because of their evident advantages, including high energy and power density, environmental friendliness and low cost as a result of the sulfur-rich nature of Earth [1][2][3]. However, commercialization of LSBs has been impeded by low S utilization, a consequence of the shuttle effect of soluble lithium polysulfides, along with fast capacity decay and low electron conductivity of S/Li 2 S 2 /Li 2 S, huge volume variation of active S upon lithiation, and corrosion of Li anodes [4][5][6][7]. In recent years, various strategies have been adopted to weaken the influence of the above issues and improve the electrochemical performance of LSBs, including modification of the separator [8][9][10][11][12][13][14], the creation of new electrolytes [15][16][17][18], the addition of protection for the Li anode [19][20][21], and improvement of the sulfur host [22][23][24][25][26][27][28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have previously shown that during galvanostatic charge–discharge cycling of lithium–sulfur cells in pores of carbon particles (Ketjenblack EC‐600JD), “electrochemically inactive” lithium sulfide gradually accumulates …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The density of lithium sulfide is 1.64 g cm −3 . The volume of the Ketjenblack EC‐600JD pores is 1.8–2.0 cm 3 g −1 ; therefore, 1 g of Ketjenblack EC‐600JD can accommodate up to 3.28 g of Li 2 S …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations