2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10562-020-03154-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur-Resistant Cu0.7Ni0.3Fe2O4 Catalyst for Removing NO from Diesel Exhausts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of the increase in the acidity of the catalyst surface, NH 3 molecules are easily adsorbed on the surface of the acidic catalysts. In addition, the increase in acidity shortens the residence time of NO molecules, accelerating the catalytic reaction, thus improving the NO oxidation ability …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because of the increase in the acidity of the catalyst surface, NH 3 molecules are easily adsorbed on the surface of the acidic catalysts. In addition, the increase in acidity shortens the residence time of NO molecules, accelerating the catalytic reaction, thus improving the NO oxidation ability …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the increase in acidity shortens the residence time of NO molecules, accelerating the catalytic reaction, thus improving the NO oxidation ability. 44 NO-TPD (Figure 6d) was used to investigate the NO adsorption/desorption species on the surfaces. Two desorption peaks at 170 and 345 °C were observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the relatively high sulphur content in Chinese diesel, the catalyst in the NH3-SCR process for eliminating NO from diesel exhaust is susceptible to poisoning. By employing citric acid as a complexing agent, spinel-type Cu1xNixFe2O4 (x = 0-0.5) catalysts with different Ni concentrations were produced using the sol-gel technique by Liang et.al (Liang, 2020) to counter this. In a uidized bed reactor, the catalytic activities for NO removal in sulfur-free and sulfur-containing (SO2, 0.035 percent, volume fraction) air were examined.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%