2002
DOI: 10.2138/am-2002-2-304
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur saturation limits in silicate melts and their implications for core formation scenarios for terrestrial planets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

9
105
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
105
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors explain these modeling predictions by compositional and pressure effects on the activities of the sulfide and sulfate species dissolved in the melt. In addition, this hypothesis is also consistent with the fact that the SCSS (Sulfur Concentration at Sulfide Saturation) and the SCAS (Sulfur Concentration at Anhydrite Saturation) decrease with increasing degree of melt polymerization (Holzheid and Grove, 2002;Yang, 2012;Zajacz et al, 2013;Zajacz, 2015). Therefore, the respective dataset of Botcharnikov et al (2011) and Jégo and Pichavant (2012) seem to be mutually consistent to each other.…”
Section: Speciation and Dissolution Of Sulfursupporting
confidence: 80%
“…The authors explain these modeling predictions by compositional and pressure effects on the activities of the sulfide and sulfate species dissolved in the melt. In addition, this hypothesis is also consistent with the fact that the SCSS (Sulfur Concentration at Sulfide Saturation) and the SCAS (Sulfur Concentration at Anhydrite Saturation) decrease with increasing degree of melt polymerization (Holzheid and Grove, 2002;Yang, 2012;Zajacz et al, 2013;Zajacz, 2015). Therefore, the respective dataset of Botcharnikov et al (2011) and Jégo and Pichavant (2012) seem to be mutually consistent to each other.…”
Section: Speciation and Dissolution Of Sulfursupporting
confidence: 80%
“…Several predictive models of SCSS in silicate melts have been previously published and allow prediction of SCSS in magmas relevant to the Earth or Mars (Holzheid and Grove, 2002;Li and Ripley, 2005;Righter et al, 2009;Ding et al, 2014). These models do not reproduce our experimental results ( Supplementary Fig.…”
Section: Modeling Sulfur Solubility In Silicate Meltscontrasting
confidence: 56%
“…For these compositional terms, we used molar fractions normalized to SiO 2 . This takes into account the degree of polymerization of the melt, which plays a role on SCSS (Holzheid and Grove, 2002), and also reduces the errors when applying the model to Mercurian magmas for which elemental ratios (normalized to Si) were measured by MESSENGER. In theory, SCSS could be adequately modeled independently of f O 2 because S in both the silicate melt and the sulfide melt is present as S 2− .…”
Section: Modeling Sulfur Solubility In Silicate Meltsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Again this is unexpected based on knowledge of low P-T partitioning experiments, which show large inter-element fractionations (e.g., see review in Walter et al, 2000). These two distinctive features of the HSE have long been interpreted as resulting from a late-addition of oxidized material with chondritic relative abundance levels of the HSE (Kimura et al, 1974;Wänke, 1981;Ringwood, 1984;Wänke et al, 1984;O'Neill, 1991a,b;O'Neill and Palme, 1998;Holzheid and Grove, 2002). The idea is that after core formation ceased, the addition of the 'late veneer' was very efficiently mixed into the mantle, perhaps while in a partially molten state, and that this established the abundances of HSE without significantly perturbing the MSE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%