2001
DOI: 10.1039/b009047f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulfur uptake and exchange, HDS activity and structure of sulfided, Al2O3 supported MoOx, PdMoOx and PtMoOx catalysts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Consequently, the molybdenum-oxide layer is to be regarded as being near to the monomolecular one on the alumina surface in the two metal-promoted samples, similarly to the observations made before [6,7,10] with non-promoted molybdena-alumina samples. It is of interest to note that the surface coverage of the NiMoO x sample is to some extent higher than that for the non-promoted one (82% [10]. In contrast to this, the addition of Co does not influence the surface coverage of the support by molybdena.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Consequently, the molybdenum-oxide layer is to be regarded as being near to the monomolecular one on the alumina surface in the two metal-promoted samples, similarly to the observations made before [6,7,10] with non-promoted molybdena-alumina samples. It is of interest to note that the surface coverage of the NiMoO x sample is to some extent higher than that for the non-promoted one (82% [10]. In contrast to this, the addition of Co does not influence the surface coverage of the support by molybdena.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In contrast to this, the addition of Co does not influence the surface coverage of the support by molybdena. It is worth noticing that the amounts of irreversible sulfur uptake [10], and the conversion rate of thiophene hydrodesulfurization are higher on the NiMo sample as compared to those on CoMo [18]. The data available, however, are not sufficient for making any definite conclusion, but the differences observed between the two catalysts deserve attention.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a number of cases, in order to obtain a composite oxide catalyst with an extended surface and high catalytic activity, Pt additives (up to 0.1 mass %) are used with reduction of MoO 3 by hydrogen [2][3][4][5]. We observed an increase in specific surface area and catalytic activity in oxidation of H 2 and CO [6] also when specimens of MoO 3 and WO 3 , promoted by small amounts of Cs + , were reduced.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%