1972
DOI: 10.1007/bf00635802
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim: Pharmacokinetic studies in patients with chronic renal failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to findings in non-dialysis dependent renally impaired patients, unchanged SMX concentrations do not increase in patients with renal impairment sufficient to necessitate dialysis [8]. However, the concentrations of TMP and of SMX metabolites increased in dialysis-dependent patients compared to patients with severe non-dialysis dependent renal impairment [8].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 55%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to findings in non-dialysis dependent renally impaired patients, unchanged SMX concentrations do not increase in patients with renal impairment sufficient to necessitate dialysis [8]. However, the concentrations of TMP and of SMX metabolites increased in dialysis-dependent patients compared to patients with severe non-dialysis dependent renal impairment [8].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 55%
“…However, the concentrations of TMP and of SMX metabolites increased in dialysis-dependent patients compared to patients with severe non-dialysis dependent renal impairment [8]. Surprisingly, given the drug’s prolonged use, only limited description of the effect of dialysis on removal of each drug during a dialysis session is available; none for critically ill patients.…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The apparent volume of distribution for TMP is around 100:1 (69-138 I) but only around 13 1 (l 0-16 I) in the case of SMX, which indicates a far greater tissue (cell) penetration for TMP than for SMX (BERGAN and BRODWALL 1972a;BUNGER et al 1961;BUTTNER 1973, 1974;. In reduced renal function, the volume of distribution is increased, especially in the case of SMXa, presumably as a secondary feature to reduced protein binding (BAETHKE et al 1972;BUTTNER et al 1964;RIEDER et al 1974c;WELLING et al 1973) and to qualitative and quantitative changes in the body fluids (RIEDER et al 1974c). In reduced renal function, the volume of distribution is increased, especially in the case of SMXa, presumably as a secondary feature to reduced protein binding (BAETHKE et al 1972;BUTTNER et al 1964;RIEDER et al 1974c;WELLING et al 1973) and to qualitative and quantitative changes in the body fluids (RIEDER et al 1974c).…”
Section: Plasmamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A routine adminis tration of the SM/TM combination has been warned against, if the serum creatinine is over 2 mg% [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%