“…In proteins, methionine residues are not equally sensitive to oxidation, but it appears that the surface-exposed ones are more sensitive to oxidation than the buried residues. Moreover, the amino acid environment determines the sensitivity to oxidation and the propensity to form one or the other diastereomer, although no sequence ‘signature’ of Met oxidation could be clearly defined [9,24,25]. Oxidation of Met in proteins can have several consequences (see [26,27] for reviews), and depending on these consequences, oxidized proteins can be classified into four groups [9]: (i) proteins not impaired by Met oxidation, which could fulfill, together with MSRs, an antioxidant function through cyclic oxidation and reduction of Met [28], (ii) proteins damaged by Met oxidation, such as those involved in neurodegenerative diseases [29–31], (iii) unfolded proteins and nascent polypeptides whose protein core Met are susceptible to oxidation thereby affecting their proper folding which has been shown to greatly accelerate their degradation [9], and (iv) proteins whose functions are actively regulated by cyclic Met oxidation/reduction.…”