2010
DOI: 10.1093/imrn/rnm007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sum-product Estimates in Finite Fields via Kloosterman Sums

Abstract: We establish improved sum-product bounds in finite fields using incidence theorems based on bounds for classical Kloosterman and related sums.1991 Mathematics Subject Classification. 42B10;81S30;94A12.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
85
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
5
85
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This enabled the first two authors and J. Solymosi to use its analog to obtain a nontrivial sum-product estimate ( [11]). The basis for the latter results was Weil's bound ( [21]) for Kloosterman sums,…”
Section: Theorem 13 ([12]) Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This enabled the first two authors and J. Solymosi to use its analog to obtain a nontrivial sum-product estimate ( [11]). The basis for the latter results was Weil's bound ( [21]) for Kloosterman sums,…”
Section: Theorem 13 ([12]) Suppose Thatmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[9]) that if d = 3 and q is prime, this conclusion holds if the number of elements |A| ≥ Cq fact be a subfield. See also [2], [4], [8], [7], [11], [14], [19], [20] and the references contained therein on recent progress related to this problem and its analogs. For example, Glibichuk, [8], proved that 8A · B = Z p , p prime, provided that |A||B| > p and either A = −A or A ∩ (−A) = ∅.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clearly (5) is not implied by (10) and (11). On the other hand, we show that our approach also gives an alternative proof of the corresponding results of [9] and [18] for available at https://www.cambridge.org/core/terms.…”
Section: Possible Improvementsmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…, A n , B n ; λ) to denote its number of solutions. In the case A 1 = B 1 = · · · = A n = B n = A, it is shown in [11], using bounds of Kloosterman sums, that (15) has a solution for any λ ∈ ‫ކ‬ q , provided that #A ≥ q 1/2+1/(2n) . Clearly, using multiplicative character sums one can also obtain new results for equation (15) (for example, in the case when the sets B 1 , .…”
Section: Further Problemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These kinds of results have found many important applications in various areas of mathematics, and people want to know some quantitative relationships between δ and ǫ in certain ranges of |A|. For the case |A| p 0.5 , the pioneer work was due to Hart, Iosevich and Solymosi [12] via Kloosterman sums. See [6,8,18] for further improvements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%