1974
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.9.1444
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sum rule for deep-inelastic electroproduction from polarized protons

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
386
7
1

Year Published

1991
1991
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 514 publications
(410 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
16
386
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are at variance with the Ellis{Ja e assumption of a s = 0 and the prediction a 0 = 3 F D = 0 : 579 0:025 [35]. The Ellis{Ja e sum rule predicts d 1 = 0 : 071 0:003 at Q 2 0 = 1 0 GeV 2 , which is 3.7 standard deviations above our measurement.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…These results are at variance with the Ellis{Ja e assumption of a s = 0 and the prediction a 0 = 3 F D = 0 : 579 0:025 [35]. The Ellis{Ja e sum rule predicts d 1 = 0 : 071 0:003 at Q 2 0 = 1 0 GeV 2 , which is 3.7 standard deviations above our measurement.…”
contrasting
confidence: 54%
“…It is the fact that a 0 is much less than a 8 , as would be predicted on the basis of the simple quark model (the Ellis-Jaffe sum rule [39]), that is known as the 'proton spin' problem. For a careful analysis of the distinction between the angular momentum (spin) of the proton and the axial coupling a 0 , see however refs.…”
Section: Pseudoscalar Meson Couplings Of the Nucleon And The U(1) A Gmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The discovery of the disagreement between the combined EMC-SLAC data [1,2] and the constituent quark model expectation [3] 1 0 dxg p 1 (x, Q 2 ) ≈ 0.15|g A | attracted a lot of attention and triggered intensive research in the field of polarized deep inelastic scattering. More recently, deuterium scattering data of the SMC [4] and of the E143 [5] collaborations, and 3 He scattering data of the E142 [6] and E154 [7] collaborations also allowed the determination of the neutron sum rule 1 0 dxg n 1 (x, Q 2 ) and the Bjorken sum rule [8] 1 0 dx[g p 1 (x, Q 2 ) − g n 1 (x, Q 2 )]. At present the Bjorken sum rule is confirmed at the 8% level [9] which is an important experimental test of Quantum Chromodynamics.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%