1999
DOI: 10.2172/766386
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary and Evaluation of NRC-Sponsored Stellite 6 Aging and Friction Tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of interstitials, our HSE calculations reveal that the H-H pathway is dominant with the migration barrier H m;H-H ¼ 0:47 eV (H m;H-X ¼ 0:75 eV, H m;H-T ¼ 0:53 eV, and H m;T-X ¼ 0:67 eV). In contrast to the defect formation energy, where HSE exhibits a good agreement with higher-level calculations and experimental values, there is a marked difference between HSE (0.47-0.75 eV) and experiment (0.20 eV [41]) for the migration barrier height. Upon including the vdW interactions, all HSE migration barriers are decreased when using the HSE þ vdW approach.…”
Section: H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 60%
“…In the case of interstitials, our HSE calculations reveal that the H-H pathway is dominant with the migration barrier H m;H-H ¼ 0:47 eV (H m;H-X ¼ 0:75 eV, H m;H-T ¼ 0:53 eV, and H m;T-X ¼ 0:67 eV). In contrast to the defect formation energy, where HSE exhibits a good agreement with higher-level calculations and experimental values, there is a marked difference between HSE (0.47-0.75 eV) and experiment (0.20 eV [41]) for the migration barrier height. Upon including the vdW interactions, all HSE migration barriers are decreased when using the HSE þ vdW approach.…”
Section: H Y S I C a L R E V I E W L E T T E R Smentioning
confidence: 60%