1941
DOI: 10.2307/4583578
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary of Physical Findings on Men Drafted in the World War

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1941
1941
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a paucity of data available with respect to the association between vitamin D and risk of caries. Dunning (33) used geographical variation/latitude as a surrogate marker of 25(OH)D due to UV-B exposure among World War I to World War II Army and Navy recruits (34)(35)(36) . Results were suggestive of a higher prevalence of caries associated with greater latitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a paucity of data available with respect to the association between vitamin D and risk of caries. Dunning (33) used geographical variation/latitude as a surrogate marker of 25(OH)D due to UV-B exposure among World War I to World War II Army and Navy recruits (34)(35)(36) . Results were suggestive of a higher prevalence of caries associated with greater latitude.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Teeth help in maintaining general health via nutrition, 9, 10 make a substantial contribution to one's physical appearance, 11 and have significant impacts on one's earnings 12 and employment opportunities. [13][14][15] Therefore, tooth loss may substantially affect an individual's quality of life. The goal of our study was to estimate the association between CWF exposure at various stages of life and adult tooth loss.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 With respect to employment, the anecdotes described above suggest that people who lack teeth may have trouble finding jobs (Shipler (2004); Eckholm (2006)). Military requirements result in rejecting or not deploying potential soldiers from service because of missing teeth (Britten and Perrott (1941); Klein (1941)) or poor oral health (Chaffin et al 2003) because dental emergencies interfere with combat readiness (Teweles and King, 1987). But there is no systematic evidence we are aware of that links oral health with labor market outcomes.…”
Section: B Discrimination and The Labor Marketmentioning
confidence: 99%