1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-6090(98)00428-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summary of Schottky barrier height data on epitaxially grown n- and p-GaAs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
19
0
2

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
4
19
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…7 Results for ⌽ B IV for diodes prepared on in situ UHV cleaved ͑011͒ substrates are also within this range 20 ͑0.85 eV͒ as are electrodeposited contacts 19 ͑0.72-0.82 eV͒ including our own result for ͑GaAs͒ ͑111͒B, 0.77 eV. Values for ⌽ B IV are between 0.73 and 0.89 eV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…7 Results for ⌽ B IV for diodes prepared on in situ UHV cleaved ͑011͒ substrates are also within this range 20 ͑0.85 eV͒ as are electrodeposited contacts 19 ͑0.72-0.82 eV͒ including our own result for ͑GaAs͒ ͑111͒B, 0.77 eV. Values for ⌽ B IV are between 0.73 and 0.89 eV.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…2a shows the temperature dependence of the reverse current at bias V = 1.0 V. The activation energy estimated from this dependence in the high-temperature region is equal to E a = 0.69 ± 0.02 and E a = 0.58 ± 0.02 eV for Cr/nGaAs and Ag/p-GaAs, respectively. These values are very close to the barrier heights values at the Cr/GaAs and Ag/GaAs interfaces, which are in reasonable agreement with the data of [7,8]. This is an evidence of the predominant contribution of the thermionic emission mechanism to dark current flow at high-temperature region.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…5(c)) tend to the value of 0.892 V, which, as already mentioned, practically corresponds to the value obtained for contacts formed by the electron-beam evaporation of iridium (0.90 V). 17,18 But at the same time, there is a deviation from the calculated curve, which is the greater, the smaller the contact diameter: the dependence u b ðVÞ drops with decreasing diameter, instead of fitting the unified calculated curve (solid line), as in Ref. 12.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%