Summary of: Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns

Ivanova, Monika M; Rodd, Helen

doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.412

Br Dent J

2010

DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.2010.412

|View full text |Cite

Summary of: Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns

Monika M Ivanova

Helen Rodd

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Year Published

2023

Publication Types

Select...

Article1

Relationship

Self Cite0

Independent1

Authors

Journals

Cited by 1 publication

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study

Kumar¹,

Rani²,

Namdev³

et al. 2023

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A bstract Introduction The study was performed to evaluate and compare the clinical and radiographic efficacy of chlorhexidine (CHX) polymer scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and formocresol for vital primary pulp therapy—a randomized clinical study. Materials and methods A total of 120 primary molars were included from children aged between 6 and 8 years in this randomized clinical study based on inclusion and exclusion criteria and were randomly allocated into three groups (group I—CHX polymer scaffold, group II—3Mixtatin, and group III—formocresol. Pulpotomy was performed in a vital cariously exposed primary tooth with healthy periodontium where their retention is more beneficial than extraction. Subjects were followed up at 1, 3, and 6 months for clinical and radiographic evaluations. Results At 6 months of follow-up, the overall success rate of pulpotomy in groups I, II, and III was 56.41, 71.05, and 60.52% in each group, respectively. Nonsignificant difference ( p > 0.05) was seen during intergroup comparison. Conclusion However, among the three materials used in this study, 3mixtatin comparatively had better results. How to cite this article Goel N. Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(3):478-482.

show abstract

Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study

Kumar¹,

Rani²,

Namdev³

et al. 2023

International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.

Contact Info

customersupport@researchsolutions.com

10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614

Henderson, NV 89052, USA

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Blog Terms and Conditions API Terms Privacy Policy Contact Cookie Preferences Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information

Made with 💙 for researchers

Part of the Research Solutions Family.

Summary of: Success rate of calcium hydroxide pulpotomy in primary molars restored with amalgam and stainless steel crowns

Cited by 1 publication

References 4 publications

Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study

Comparative Evaluation of Chlorhexidine Polymer Scaffold, 3Mixtatin, and Formocresol for Vital Primary Pulp Therapy: A Randomized 6-month Clinical Study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About