1977
DOI: 10.3758/bf03198745
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summation of successively established orientation-contingent color aftereffects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
1

Year Published

1978
1978
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Given the long-lasting nature of the ME (e.g., Jones & Holding, 1975), the finding that additional training on a second day did not significantly strengthen the aftereffect is somewhat surprising. This finding, however, is similar to others in the ME literature (White, 1977).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…Given the long-lasting nature of the ME (e.g., Jones & Holding, 1975), the finding that additional training on a second day did not significantly strengthen the aftereffect is somewhat surprising. This finding, however, is similar to others in the ME literature (White, 1977).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 48%
“…While ME strength measured by this method is not directly comparable with more conventional methods such as those of Riggs et al (I974) or MacKay and MacKay (I975), relative comparisons may be made. Shute found that decay curves obtained with the Riggs method by Skowbo et al (1974Skowbo et al ( , 1975 and White (1977) followed a similar power function to those obtained by the match interference method while those obtained by the MacKay method could not be so described.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Very infrequent testing slows decay, as Skowbo et al (1974) found with 8 h intervals and it seems likely that very frequent or continuous testing accelerates decay. Shute (1979), using data from White (1977) and his own observations, estimated that the ME would be completely extinguished between 12 h and 29 h. In practical terms this is a very considerable overestimation since the retardation match is imperceptibly different from white light when it falls to between 23% and 19%, long before the extrapolated function reaches zero.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The second component of decay begins from the time of first testing, rather than from the end of adaptation, and may subsequently be measured by repeated testing at regular intervals. This second component was described by Riggs, White & Eimas (1974), Mackay & Mackay (1974), Jones & Holding (1975), White (1977) and Shute (1979). Jones & Holding suggested that this second component of decay is initiated by the first test.…”
Section: Extraversion and The Mccollough Effectmentioning
confidence: 90%