According to a Pavlovian conditioning analysis of the orientation-contingent color aftereffect (the McCollough effect), orientation stimuli become associated with simultaneously presented chromatic stimuli. This account suggests that decreasing the contingency between the putative conditional stimulus (grid orientation) and the unconditional stimulus (color)should decrease the strength of the aftereffect. In the present experiment, the effect of presentations of achromatic grids and/or homogeneous chromatic stimuli between presentations of chromatic grids was evaluated. Although interpolated achromatic grid presentations did decrease the magnitude of the McCollough effect, interpolated chromatic stimuli had no effect on the magnitude of the phenomenon. The results are discussed in terms of current research concerning the selective associability of certain categories of conditional and unconditional stimuli, and differences in the development of associations between simultaneously (compared with successively) presented conditional and unconditional stimuli.Orientation-contingent color aftereffects, originally reported by McCollough (1965), are readily demonstrated. During a training period of several minutes, an observer inspects two patterns that alternate every few seconds. For example, one pattern could consist of black horizontal bars on a green background and the other pattern could consist of black vertical bars on a magenta background. Following such training, complementary color aftereffects contingent on bar orientation are noted. In the above example, the achromatic background of horizontal bars would appear pinkish and the achromatic background of vertical bars would appear greenish.A number of investigators (e.g., Allan & Siegel, 1986; Bonnet, 1975; Bonnett, LeGall, & Lorenceau, 1984;Murch, 1976; Schmidt, Pinette, & Finke, 1978;Siegel & Allan, 1985; Skowbo, Timney, Gentry, & Morant, 1975;Westbrook & Harrison, 1984) have suggested that the McCollough effect (ME) is a phenomenon of classical conditioning. According to Murch (1976), The lined grid in inspection functions as a conditioned stimulus (CS) while color functions as the unconditioned stimulus (DCS). As a resultof the pairingof the CS (lined grid) with the DCS (color) a conditioned response (CR) develops so that the adaptive response of the visualsystem to the color is evoked by the lined grid. (p. 615)There is considerable controversy as to the associative status of the ME (Allan & Siegel, 1986;Skowbo, 1984Skowbo, , 1986. One finding that has been seen as contrary to an associative analysis of the phenomenon is the failure to demonstrate that it is decremented by reducing the con- tingency between the putative CS and UCS. Skowbo and Forster (1983) reported that the addition of homogeneous chromatic stimuli (presumably equivalent to UCSalone presentations) to the sequence of usual grid-pluscolor McCollough patterns did not have a significant influence on the size of the ME. Inasmuch as interpolated UCS-alone presentations often decrement the s...