2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jembe.2009.06.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Summer activity pattern and Field Metabolic Rate of adult male sea otters (Enhydra lutris) in a soft sediment habitat in Alaska

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One explanation for the higher mortality risk of the more active individuals could be a result of higher metabolic rates if isopod activity is connected to metabolic rate (as in Finerty et al. ). It has been discussed that consistent individual differences in energy metabolism could promote behavioral patterns that provide net energy (for instance foraging activity) and/or consume energy (for instance courtship activity) (reviewed in Biro & Stamps ) and, thus, link energy metabolism to behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One explanation for the higher mortality risk of the more active individuals could be a result of higher metabolic rates if isopod activity is connected to metabolic rate (as in Finerty et al. ). It has been discussed that consistent individual differences in energy metabolism could promote behavioral patterns that provide net energy (for instance foraging activity) and/or consume energy (for instance courtship activity) (reviewed in Biro & Stamps ) and, thus, link energy metabolism to behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As our results reveal the life-history trade-offs for activity, they support the pace-of-life syndrome hypothesis (POLS) proposed by Reale et al (2010), which assumed that consistent behavioral differences among individuals covary with the life-history and the physiological traits of the individuals. One explanation for the higher mortality risk of the more active individuals could be a result of higher metabolic rates if isopod activity is connected to metabolic rate (as in Finerty et al 2009). It has been discussed that consistent individual differences in energy metabolism could promote behavioral patterns that provide net energy (for instance foraging activity) and/or consume energy (for instance courtship activity) (reviewed in Biro & Stamps 2010) and, thus, link energy metabolism to behavior.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the first evidence to suggest that territory quality is associated with an oxidative cost. This could be due to the increased metabolic demands of patrolling territories, performing territorial displays or defending territories from intruders (Ros et al, 2006;Finerty et al, 2009). Owners of larger or higher-quality territories have a greater area to patrol and are more likely to suffer intrusions (Eberhard & Ewald, 1994), this is expected to increase their metabolic rate, and subsequently led to an increased production of reactive oxygen species and oxidative stress (Fletcher et al, 2013).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although researchers have begun exploring how physiology can mediate carry-over effects from one life-history stage to another (Mark & Rubenstein, 2013), little attention has been paid to how various reproductive behaviours may contribute to the costs of reproduction within a single life-history stage. One behaviour crucial for reproduction, territory defence can be intense, time-consuming, can increase the risk of injury and is energetically costly (Ros et al, 2006;Finerty et al, 2009). Furthermore, variation in territory quality can have important implications for annual reproductive success (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…60 adults. Assuming an average adult body mass of 25 kg, an average field metabolic rate of 19 MJ day −1 (0.76 MJ day −1 kg −1 , Finerty et al 2009), a metabolizable energy coefficient of 0.9, and an average energy content for prey (based on clams) of 3.18 MJ kg −1 , then the amount of biomass consumed annually would be 145,388 kg ([19 MJ day −1 otter −1 × 60 otters × 365 days]/[0.9 × 3.18 MJ kg −1 ]), of which 109,041 kg (75%) are clams and 36,347 kg are other species. If we divide the biomass of clams consumed by the area of Simpson Bay (21 × 10 6 m 2 assuming that the entire bay is equally productive) and assume that the wet tissue mass of an average clam is 0.048 kg (Cortez unpub.…”
Section: Prey Depthsmentioning
confidence: 99%