“…Moreover, at the investigated site, during the cold seasons temperature and relative humidity were of 5.3 ± 3.9 °C and, respectively, (65.3 ± 12.8) % and, according with details presented in Table 4, the (NO 3 -, NH 4 + (total)) pair presented significant correlation (with Pearson coefficient of 0.98, p < 0.001, at the 99.9 % confidence level) only during the cold seasons (low temperature and high relative humidity being favourable for particulate NH 4 NO 3 formation, Stelson and Seinfeld, (1982)). During the warm 25 seasons (temperature and relative humidity of 18.9 ± 3.8 °C and, respectively, 40.5 ± 7.7 %) the (NO 3 -, NH 4 + (total)) pair correlation is of very poor significance most probably due to the influence of meteorological conditions which were not favourable for particulate NH 4 NO 3 formation (increasing temperature and decreasing relative humidity limit the production of NH 4 NO 3 aerosol (Matsumoto and Tanaka 1996;Utsunomiya and Wakamatsu 1996;Alastuey et al 2004) (by an irreversible reaction due to H 2 SO 4 affinity for NH 3 ), known to be as high as 1.5 × 10 -4 sec -1 (Harrison and Kitto, 1992), is almost similar with the reaction rate constants for NH 4 NO 3 formation (by a balanced reaction due to NH 3 affinity for HNO 3 ), which is of the order of 1.59 × 10 -4 m 3 µmoL -1 s -1 (Pandolfi et al, 2012;Behera et al, 2013 and NH 4 NO 3 will be formed via reactions R1 (Cziczo et al, 1997;Zhang et al, 2015) and R2 (Fountoukis and Nenes, 2007;Zhang et al, 2015), (Utsunomiya and Wakamatsu, 1996) and, moreover, NH 4 NO 3 will form only when available excess NH 3 will react with HNO 3 . Backes et al (2016), from their modelling study, suggest that a reduction of NH 3 emissions by 50 % may lead to a 24 % reduction of the total PM 2.5 concentrations in northwest Europe, with the reduction mainly driven by reduced formation of NH 4 NO 3 .…”