2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.rse.2018.07.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sun-induced chlorophyll fluorescence is more strongly related to absorbed light than to photosynthesis at half-hourly resolution in a rice paddy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

16
128
2
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 180 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
16
128
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that the spectral shape is quite stable and that all wavelength ranges respond to changes in variable PSII fluorescence yield driven by PQ and NPQ; (2) far‐red SIF is more closely correlated to photosynthesis and APAR than red SIF (Figures ), because it is less prone to re‐absorption by Chl at both leaf and canopy scales (Fournier et al, ; Yang & van der Tol, ). At the canopy scale, the strong correlation between SIF and APAR (Figures and ) confirms previous results in crop canopies (Miao et al, ; Yang et al, ), which makes intuitive sense since APAR covaries with seasonal changes in leaf area in these systems, and is prone to less error than calculated GPP fluxes; and (3) Since wavelengths in the far‐red spectrum are less impacted by confounding factors such as chlorophyll or canopy structure (Figure S12), current satellite retrievals in this region may be better suited to assess stress induced downregulation of photosynthesis than changes in the ChlF spectral shape alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…This implies that the spectral shape is quite stable and that all wavelength ranges respond to changes in variable PSII fluorescence yield driven by PQ and NPQ; (2) far‐red SIF is more closely correlated to photosynthesis and APAR than red SIF (Figures ), because it is less prone to re‐absorption by Chl at both leaf and canopy scales (Fournier et al, ; Yang & van der Tol, ). At the canopy scale, the strong correlation between SIF and APAR (Figures and ) confirms previous results in crop canopies (Miao et al, ; Yang et al, ), which makes intuitive sense since APAR covaries with seasonal changes in leaf area in these systems, and is prone to less error than calculated GPP fluxes; and (3) Since wavelengths in the far‐red spectrum are less impacted by confounding factors such as chlorophyll or canopy structure (Figure S12), current satellite retrievals in this region may be better suited to assess stress induced downregulation of photosynthesis than changes in the ChlF spectral shape alone.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…As a result, the GPP:SIF relationship is determined by the variations in each variable and the contributions of these variables to that relationship. Previous studies found that APAR is the primary driver that leads to the linear GPP:SIF relationship (Rossini et al, ; K. Yang, Ryu, et al, ; X. Yang, Shi, et al, ; Yang et al, ; Zhang et al, ). Some studies also suggested that LUE and SIF y contribute to the relationship and a diverse LUE:SIF y relationship implies a potentially diverse GPP:SIF relationship (Badgley et al, ; Miao et al, ; Wieneke et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…SIF has been found strongly correlated with the gross primary production (GPP) in a quasi‐linear pattern at large spatial and temporal scales (Frankenberg et al, ; Guanter et al, ; Li et al, ; Miao et al, ; Wood et al, ; Yang et al, ; K. Yang, Ryu, et al, ; Yang et al, ). Some studies suggest the potential of a universal GPP:SIF relationship across various biomes (Frankenberg et al, ; Li et al, ; Sun et al, ; but see Zhang et al, ), and others used SIF to constrain photosynthetic parameters (Guan et al, ; Perez‐Priego et al, ; Zhang et al, ; Zhang et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A recent emerging approach is based on the link between GPP and Sun‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF), which is derived from atmospheric oxygen absorption bands where small fluorescence signals can be detected from large background solar radiation (Porcar‐Castell et al, ). Although strong SIF‐GPP linkage has been demonstrated from spaceborne remote sensing at coarse temporal and spatial scales (Frankenberg et al, ; Joiner et al, ; Walther et al, ), this SIF‐GPP hypothesis has not been well confirmed for proximal SIF applications across vegetation types, mainly due to the difficulty in detecting and interpreting weak SIF signals (Gamon, ; Porcar‐Castell et al, ; Shrestha et al, ; Yang et al, ). Another promising approach to remotely assess photosynthetic phenology is based on photochemical reflectance index (PRI), which is sensitive to diurnal and seasonal changes in vegetation pigment contents (Gamon et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%