2020
DOI: 10.1002/essoar.10501587.2
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sun-Induced Fluorescence's Correlation to Carbon-Flux Increases When Raw Data is Adjusted to Account for Vegetation Biochemistry and Structure.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, preliminary results from another study testing different biochemistry-and structure-related adjustments to SIF has found that the product of SIF by a proxy of f APAR showed the highest observed correlation to FLUXNET GPP data in comparison to various tested formulations [66]. The findings of that study suggest that SIF is not proportional to LUE by itself but rather to the instantaneous light-use efficiency under a given light incidence level (i.e., PAR * LUE).…”
Section: Land Cover Classification Datamentioning
confidence: 79%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, preliminary results from another study testing different biochemistry-and structure-related adjustments to SIF has found that the product of SIF by a proxy of f APAR showed the highest observed correlation to FLUXNET GPP data in comparison to various tested formulations [66]. The findings of that study suggest that SIF is not proportional to LUE by itself but rather to the instantaneous light-use efficiency under a given light incidence level (i.e., PAR * LUE).…”
Section: Land Cover Classification Datamentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The SIF FR -Prod adjustment, based on the classic productivity equation of Monteith and Moss [62,63], already shown in a preliminary study to increase the correlation between GOME-2 SIF and FLUXNET GPP across diverse vegetation types [66], yielded significant improvements on LMM Temperature and Soil Moisture in Yield-normalized models (Tab. 2) shows that much of these unmodelled differences concern biochemical and structural influences on GOME-2 SIF data.…”
Section: Linear Mixed Models and Our Adjustments To Sifmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SIF FR -Prod adjustment, based on the classic productivity equation of Monteith and Moss [62,63], already shown in a preliminary study to increase the correlation between GOME-2 SIF and FLUXNET GPP across diverse vegetation types [66], yielded significant improvements on LMM goodness-of-fit in relation to standard SIF (Table 3). However, due to the substantial increase it caused in the effect size of the Ecoregion factor on tested LMMs (Table 2) and, considering that this effect encapsulates part of the structural variability between the different ecoregions, we conjecture that SIF FR -Prod may be "double-counting" the influence of emitting vegetation as it is calculated by multiplying SIF by NDVI and both variables are strongly influenced by vegetation structure and biochemistry.…”
Section: Linear Mixed Models and Our Adjustments To Sifmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…This classic equation has been frequently used to estimate GPP through the LUE-paradigm [65] and SIF has been proposed as a suitable proxy for LUE [2,10], although studies testing this proposition have reached confounding results [11,59]. However, preliminary results from another study testing different biochemistry-and structure-related adjustments to SIF has found that the product of SIF by a proxy of f APAR showed the highest observed correlation to FLUXNET GPP data in comparison to various tested formulations [66]. The findings of that study suggest that SIF is not proportional to LUE by itself but rather to the instantaneous light-use efficiency under a given light incidence level (i.e., PAR * LUE).…”
Section: Sun-induced Fluorescencementioning
confidence: 99%