2003
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20031057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sunspot plume observations in the EUV

Abstract: Abstract. The electron density over a bright sunspot plume region was evaluated using lines within the O  760 Å multiplet. The plume showed an intensity enhancement factor of ≈9 in the O  lines compared to regions outside the sunspot umbra. Internal agreement between the various ratios is excellent which would suggest that the O  lines do not suffer from blending problems.The derived mean electron densities for the sunspot plume is log N e /cm −3 ≈ 9.9 compared to log N e /cm −3 ≈ 10.20−10.45 in the surroun… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The derived density in the sunspot plume here is consistent with those derived by Doyle et al (1985) and Doyle & Madjarska (2003). In Doyle et al (1985), the authors used the ratio of O v 760 Å/630 Å obtained by the S-055 EUV spectrometer onboard Skylab and derived a density of log(N e /cm −3 ) = 10.…”
Section: Electron Densitiessupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The derived density in the sunspot plume here is consistent with those derived by Doyle et al (1985) and Doyle & Madjarska (2003). In Doyle et al (1985), the authors used the ratio of O v 760 Å/630 Å obtained by the S-055 EUV spectrometer onboard Skylab and derived a density of log(N e /cm −3 ) = 10.…”
Section: Electron Densitiessupporting
confidence: 85%
“…This hypothesis seems to be supported by the observational result of Brosius (2005), in which a significantly higher density (log(N e /cm −3 ) = 9.8, compared to log(N e /cm −3 ) = 8.9 in the plume, in an upflow region outside the sunspot was observed by CDS. Doyle & Madjarska (2003) also measured higher densities (with log(N e /cm −3 ) ranging from 10.20 to 10.45) in nearby quiet regions (their QS 1 might be a plage region) than in the plume (log(N e /cm −3 ) ∼ 9.9), and suggested that the gas pressure difference might be sufficient to drive siphon flows from outside the spot into the umbra. Our measured densities in different regions also seem to support this idea.…”
Section: Electron Densitiesmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…A model that is consistent with the data involves nested flux tubes with a wide range of properties, including density, temperature, and flow speed. Evidence in support of this comes from extreme-UV observations, which show variable flow speeds of several tens of km s À1 and density contrasts of up to 2 ( Doyle & Madjarska 2003;Brosius 2005). Siphon flows along closed flux tubes in the corona are driven by significantly different properties near the footpoint and by different heating and cooling rates within the flux tube.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Sunspot plumes are generally located above sunspots and have downflows of 20-30 km s −1 (Maltby et al 1999;Brynildsen et al 2001;Brosius 2005). They flow from outside the sunspots toward the umbrae due to gas pressure difference (Doyle & Madjarska 2003). In addition, it has been reported that plumes are identified in EUV lines formed at TR temperatures of 5.2 ≤ log T (K)≤ 5.9 (Brosius 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%