1978
DOI: 10.1002/ijch.197800038
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

13C‐Kinetic Isotope Effects in Photosynthetic Carboxylation Reactions and δ13C‐Values of Plant Material

Abstract: AblItraet. The influenceof different parameters on B 13 C-values in plants in vivo and on the 13C-isotope effect of the carboxylation reactions in vitro were examined using isotope ratio mass spectrometry.The primary fixation of carbon in photosynthesis occurs in so-called Cs-plants via the ribulosebisphosphate carboxylase (RuBP-C) reaction, and in Cs-plants via the phosphoenolpyruvate carboxylase (PEP-C) reaction. The observed difference in 813C-values" of the organic material of these two groups of plants is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
40
0
1

Year Published

1979
1979
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
40
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, a negative temperature coefficient of Ϫ0.27‰°C Ϫ1 for mean December temperatures has been reported in tree rings of Juniperus (Leavitt and Long, 1983), while a temperature coefficient of Ϫ0.7‰°C Ϫ1 was recorded for the rings of naturally grown Elm trees in Massachusetts (Farmer, 1979). In several growth chamber experiments, negative carbon isotope temperature coefficients have also been recorded in whole plants and leaves (Smith et al, 1973;Troughton and Gard, 1975;Smith et al, 1976;Schmidt et al, 1978). However, the mechanism leading to these negative coefficients remains elusive, although in an investigation of fractionation by CO 2 -fixing enzymes isolated from soybean leaves revealed a negative carbon isotope temperature coefficient (Ϫ0.22‰°C Ϫ1 ) for RuBP carboxylase (initial carboxylating enzyme in C 3 plants; Christeller et al, 1976).…”
Section: Correlation Of ␦ 13 C Values With Temperature Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a negative temperature coefficient of Ϫ0.27‰°C Ϫ1 for mean December temperatures has been reported in tree rings of Juniperus (Leavitt and Long, 1983), while a temperature coefficient of Ϫ0.7‰°C Ϫ1 was recorded for the rings of naturally grown Elm trees in Massachusetts (Farmer, 1979). In several growth chamber experiments, negative carbon isotope temperature coefficients have also been recorded in whole plants and leaves (Smith et al, 1973;Troughton and Gard, 1975;Smith et al, 1976;Schmidt et al, 1978). However, the mechanism leading to these negative coefficients remains elusive, although in an investigation of fractionation by CO 2 -fixing enzymes isolated from soybean leaves revealed a negative carbon isotope temperature coefficient (Ϫ0.22‰°C Ϫ1 ) for RuBP carboxylase (initial carboxylating enzyme in C 3 plants; Christeller et al, 1976).…”
Section: Correlation Of ␦ 13 C Values With Temperature Variationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rubisco catalyses the first step in CO2 fixation in C^, plants: I HC-OH I HC-OH I CH2-OPO3 CO-HC-OH +2 H+ (11) It was recognized early that isotope fractionation by this enzyme was probably a source of the large isotope fractionation seen in C3 plants (Park & Epstein 1960, 1961. A variety of investigators have measured this fractionation by combustion analysis (Christeller, Laing & Troughton 1976: Estep, Tabita & van Baalen 1978Wong, Benedict & Kohel 1979), by specific analysis of individual carbon atoms in substrate and product (Roeske & O'Leary 1984), and by analysis of remaining CO2 during the carboxylation (Schmidt et al 1978: Winkler et al 1982Guy ct al. 1987).…”
Section: The Sixth Rule -Terrestrial C3 Plants Show a Large Isotope Fmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value a = 4.4‰ was calculated from diffusivity comparisons of 13 CO 2 versus 12 CO 2 in air [ Craig , 1953, 1954] and is generally accepted. Depending upon the role envisioned for the primary enzyme that facilitates carboxylation, published estimates of b range from 27.0 to 29.0‰ [ Christeller et al , 1976; Farquhar , 1979; Schmidt et al , 1978; Wong et al , 1979]. Published estimates of ( c i / c a ) range from 0.38 to 0.89 [ Arens et al , 2000] and are meant to reflect a time‐averaged value resulting from moment‐to‐moment stomatal regulation of gas exchange.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%