1980
DOI: 10.1080/09553008014550331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

241Plutonium Deposition and Redistribution in the Rat Rib

Abstract: Using the techniques of 241plutonium autoradiography and plutonium alpha-autoradiography the distribution of intravenously injected plutonium in the rat rib has been investigated, at times up to 4 months after injection. The results showed that at some time plutonium either became buried in the bone cortex or was resorbed. Plutonium which was resorbed was found in osteoclasts and macrophages. Subsequently, much of the resorbed plutonium was redeposited. The dosimetric implications of the results are discussed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
13
0

Year Published

1980
1980
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
2
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Later at 1 day after injection most uranium was buried to a depth of 4 to 5 ~m below this layer (Figure 5b). These distributions at 4 and 24 h after injection are similar to those described for 241pU (Priest & Giannola, 1980a) at 24 h and 48 h respectively. The difference in time scale is interpreted as resulting from the faster deposition of hexavalent uranium than plutonium in the skeleton, a result of its more rapid clearance from the blood-stream (Yuile, 1973).…”
Section: Gross Skeletal Distribution Studiessupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Later at 1 day after injection most uranium was buried to a depth of 4 to 5 ~m below this layer (Figure 5b). These distributions at 4 and 24 h after injection are similar to those described for 241pU (Priest & Giannola, 1980a) at 24 h and 48 h respectively. The difference in time scale is interpreted as resulting from the faster deposition of hexavalent uranium than plutonium in the skeleton, a result of its more rapid clearance from the blood-stream (Yuile, 1973).…”
Section: Gross Skeletal Distribution Studiessupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Note the heavier uptake of uranium on the growing periosteal surface (g) compared with the resorbing surface (r). surface have been constructed for the growing surfaces in PEAs of 1 pm tissue section of the rib and mandibular condyle using a method previously described for plutonium (Priest & Giannola, 1980a). These show that at 4 h the uranium was concentrated at the interface between the mineralized bone and the osteoid layer Figure 4 Photographic emulsion autoradiograph of a 1 pm thick section of the mandibular condyle; 1 day post-injection.…”
Section: Gross Skeletal Distribution Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Discussion ' Pattern of uptake The results of the present experiments show that most of the 226 Ra deposited in the rat skeleton is present as a volume deposit and is fairly evenly distributed throughout the bone matrix. This pattern of uptake is very different to that described for other a-emitting bone-seeking radionuclides such as 239pu (Green et al, 1978;Jee, 1972;Priest & Giannola, (1980),241Am (Polig, 1978;Priest et al, 1982b) and 233U (Stevens et al, 1980;Priest et al, 1982a) which deposit almost exclusively on bone surfaces. The attachment of 226 Ra to the bone matrix must in part be reversible as in excess of 20 % of the bone radium is lost to excretion within the first four days after its injection.…”
Section: Gross Skeletal Distribution Studymentioning
confidence: 55%
“…4), because about half of the intravenously injected plutonium was deposited on the endosteal bone surface 2-24h later and the plutonium was buried gradually into the bone matrix accompanied by slow bone turnover in rats. 15,17) Bone metabolism is produced by an equal balance between the osteoclast activity resolving an old bone and osteoblast activity forming :a new bone. As the increase in serum calcium rapidly destroyed the osteoclasts and resulted in the decrease of temporary bone formation and mineralization by osteoblasts, plutonium could not deposit.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%