2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00220-019-03335-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sup-Norm and Nodal Domains of Dihedral Maass Forms

Abstract: In this paper, we improve the sup-norm bound and the lower bound of the number of nodal domains for dihedral Maass forms, which are a distinguished sequence of Laplacian eigenfunctions on an arithmetic hyperbolic surface. More specifically, let φ be a dihedral Maass form with spectral parameter t φ , then we prove thatwhich is an improvement over the bound t 5/12+ε φ φ 2 given by Iwaniec and Sarnak. As a consequence, we get a better lower bound for the number of nodal domains intersecting a fixed geodesic segm… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The linear independence hypothesis in Theorem 5.3 is not satisfied when there is an arithmetic progression of spectral parameters, which is known to be true for certain classes of dihedral forms on arithmetic hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Although there are explicit descriptions of dihedral forms on non-compact hyperbolic surfaces (see [Luo13], [Hua19], for example), we were not able to find an explicit construction of dihedral forms on compact hyperbolic 3-manifolds in the literature. Thus, we present a general approach to the construction of dihedral forms on compact arithmetic hyperbolic 3-manifolds (which we refer to as co-compact dihedral forms) and provide an explicit example ] : a i ∈ Z/5Z} which is a field with 5 2 = 25 elements (since p 1 is a maximal ideal).…”
Section: Linear Dependence Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The linear independence hypothesis in Theorem 5.3 is not satisfied when there is an arithmetic progression of spectral parameters, which is known to be true for certain classes of dihedral forms on arithmetic hyperbolic 3-manifolds. Although there are explicit descriptions of dihedral forms on non-compact hyperbolic surfaces (see [Luo13], [Hua19], for example), we were not able to find an explicit construction of dihedral forms on compact hyperbolic 3-manifolds in the literature. Thus, we present a general approach to the construction of dihedral forms on compact arithmetic hyperbolic 3-manifolds (which we refer to as co-compact dihedral forms) and provide an explicit example ] : a i ∈ Z/5Z} which is a field with 5 2 = 25 elements (since p 1 is a maximal ideal).…”
Section: Linear Dependence Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…(see [20,Lemma 11]). These estimates allow us to quickly derive a short Dirichlet polynomial approximation of 1/L(1, φ 2k ) 2 , by a contour integration argument (see [19,Lemma 3] for a similar result).…”
Section: Re(s)mentioning
confidence: 99%