2012
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0657(12)70179-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super abrasive machining for PM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, SAM is more versatile than other grinding techniques. For example, if it is compared with creep fatigue grinding (the closest rival), the use of SAM achieves higher speeds, higher material removal rates-up to 1000 mm 3 /s-with lower workpiece loads, and more accurate dimensional tolerances [12,13] is what makes this technology a suitable and efficient alternative to manufacture IBRs nickel-based super alloys [14,15]. Its application to blisk fir-trees has been realized [16,17], as it is shown in Figure 2, due to the fact that the use of this technique increases efficiency significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, SAM is more versatile than other grinding techniques. For example, if it is compared with creep fatigue grinding (the closest rival), the use of SAM achieves higher speeds, higher material removal rates-up to 1000 mm 3 /s-with lower workpiece loads, and more accurate dimensional tolerances [12,13] is what makes this technology a suitable and efficient alternative to manufacture IBRs nickel-based super alloys [14,15]. Its application to blisk fir-trees has been realized [16,17], as it is shown in Figure 2, due to the fact that the use of this technique increases efficiency significantly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among grinding techniques with super abrasive grinding tools, it is found the creep feed grinding (CFG) defined as grinding process with larger cutting depths and higher feed rates resulting on higher removal rates decreasing machining time [ 23 ]. Petrilli et al [ 24 ] defined creep fatigue grinding as the closest rival for SAM achieving higher speeds and specific material removal rates up to 1000 mm 3 /mm s [ 20 ]. Major benefits from SAM reside on higher material removal rates at higher speed along with the near-shape surface obtaining more accurate dimensional tolerances [ 24 , 25 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petrilli et al [ 24 ] defined creep fatigue grinding as the closest rival for SAM achieving higher speeds and specific material removal rates up to 1000 mm 3 /mm s [ 20 ]. Major benefits from SAM reside on higher material removal rates at higher speed along with the near-shape surface obtaining more accurate dimensional tolerances [ 24 , 25 ]. The main limitation for the optimal use of this technology is found in spindle speed requirements, up to 90,000 rpm [ 26 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are some non-conventional abrasive technologies (abrasive flow machining, magnetic abrasive finishing or magneto-rheological abrasive flow finishing) characterized by their good performance for complex geometrical cavities with limited accessibility for conventional processes, achieving great dimensional accuracies and finishing surface quality requirements [61]. However, at the same time, these processes present low material removal rates, implying less productivity in terms of machining time and costs [62].…”
Section: Super Abrasive Machining (Sam)mentioning
confidence: 99%