2001
DOI: 10.1017/s0022112000002780
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super-critical withdrawal from a two-layer fluid through a line sink if the lower layer is of finite depth

Abstract: The steady response of a fluid consisting of two regions of different density, the lower of which is of finite depth, is considered during withdrawal. Super-critical flows are considered in which water from both layers is being withdrawn, meaning that the interface is drawn down directly into the sink. The results indicate that if the flow rate is above some minimum, the angle of entry of the interface depends more strongly on the relative depth of the sink than on the flow rate. This has quite dramatic conseq… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has been successfully applied in a number of different applications involving free-surface flows, see for example [6,7,14,15].…”
Section: Nonlinear Problem and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been successfully applied in a number of different applications involving free-surface flows, see for example [6,7,14,15].…”
Section: Nonlinear Problem and Numerical Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For our study, the most relevant and suggestive results are that twodimensional withdrawal differs significantly from axisymmetric withdrawal (Forbes et al (2004); Stokes et al (2005)). Also, in both 2D and axisymmetric withdrawal, whether selective withdrawal or full entrainment is realized can depend crucially on the initial conditions which determine transient evolution of the interface, instead of being solely determined by the boundary conditions (Hocking & Forbes (2001)). …”
Section: Inviscid Selective Withdrawalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this limiting value does not always coincide with the critical drawdown flow rate as described above, and solutions with a downward cusp appear to exist at a somewhat higher value. Cusped solutions were originally thought to be the critical drawdown flows, and strong evidence for this was given by Forbes et al [7,14,15]. In spite of these results, uncertainty remains about the critical flows due to poor comparison with experiment and the existence of multiple cusped solutions for certain geometries, as seen in the work of Vanden-Broeck and Keller [26] and Hocking [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%