1990
DOI: 10.1142/s0217751x90000180
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super-Liouville Theory as a Two-Dimensional, Superconformal Supergravity Theory

Abstract: In this paper we extend our previous results on the bosonic Liouville theory, to the supersymmetric case. As in the bosonic case, we find that the quantization of the N=1 theory is limited to the region D≤1. We compute the exact critical exponents and the analogue of the Hausdorff dimension of super random surfaces. Our procedure is manifestly covariant and our results hold for the surface of arbitrary topology. We also examine the N=2, O(2) string theory and find that it appears to be well-defined for all D.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
131
0
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 107 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
131
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can also be regarded as a canonical verification of the the functional measure ansatz of refs. [7,8,16]. We have also noted the subtlety concerning the cosmological term, which is not seen for the bosonic case [2].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This can also be regarded as a canonical verification of the the functional measure ansatz of refs. [7,8,16]. We have also noted the subtlety concerning the cosmological term, which is not seen for the bosonic case [2].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 66%
“…Since the (super)conformal invariance is equivalent to the BRST invariance in (super)conformal gauge, our approach naturally reproduces the basic resutls of refs. [7,8,16] as argued in refs. [22,23].…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The amplitude vanishes for any other kinematic region, where at least two momenta satisfy Rek > α 0 and are therefore "on shell" (k ·k = 0) in the critical sense. It should be stressed that the amplitude A 3 in the critical case = 0 and z 1 = ∞ , z 2 = 1 , z 3 = z , z 4 = 0 we have , after using (22), basically the same expression as in the critical case:…”
mentioning
confidence: 89%