2015
DOI: 10.1002/bies.201400170
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super‐resolution imaging for cell biologists

Abstract: The recent 2014 Nobel Prize in chemistry honored an era of discoveries and technical advancements in the field of super-resolution microscopy. However, the applications of diffraction-unlimited imaging in biology have a long road ahead and persistently engage scientists with new challenges. Some of the bottlenecks that restrain the dissemination of super-resolution techniques are tangible, and include the limited performance of affinity probes and the yet not capillary diffusion of imaging setups. Likewise, su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
82
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(82 citation statements)
references
References 134 publications
(128 reference statements)
0
82
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the combination of DNA-FISH and immunostaining resulted in apparently well-maintained chromatin morphology [4], it should be considered that the usually preferred conventional preparation techniques in super-resolution microscopy determine the practical limits of application [10]. Fornasiero et al [11] presented an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the high-resolution microscopy methods regarding various biological tasks. A challenge that must not be underestimated in this context of circumventing possible limits is the development of adequate computer-based analysis methods for the evaluation of the high-resolution data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the combination of DNA-FISH and immunostaining resulted in apparently well-maintained chromatin morphology [4], it should be considered that the usually preferred conventional preparation techniques in super-resolution microscopy determine the practical limits of application [10]. Fornasiero et al [11] presented an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of the high-resolution microscopy methods regarding various biological tasks. A challenge that must not be underestimated in this context of circumventing possible limits is the development of adequate computer-based analysis methods for the evaluation of the high-resolution data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, they are used to label structures and molecules of interest. After fixation of a specimen, which should alter the native structures as less as possible, specific fluorescent affinity probes of preferably small size (FAB fragments of antibodies, nanobodies, snap-tags) may be used for labeling (Fornasiero and Opazo, 2015). …”
Section: Specimen Preparation and The Super-resolution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to phototoxicity live cell nanoscopy is much more challenging than imaging fixed specimens (Fornasiero and Opazo, 2015). Hence, fewer live cell imaging results have been published so far in plant cell research ( Table 1 ).…”
Section: Specimen Preparation and The Super-resolution Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fortunately, super-resolution°uores-cence imaging with rapid development is a promising valuable tool in the carbohydrate study of cells, because of its predominant resolution at the nanoscale level. 29,30 In this review, we mainly introduce the principle of super-resolution imaging, the°uorescent probes available for super-resolution imaging, some common labeling methods for carbohydrates, and the applications of super-resolution imaging in the study of glycoscience.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%