2022
DOI: 10.3390/mi13091515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super-Resolution Reconstruction of Cytoskeleton Image Based on A-Net Deep Learning Network

Abstract: To date, live-cell imaging at the nanometer scale remains challenging. Even though super-resolution microscopy methods have enabled visualization of sub-cellular structures below the optical resolution limit, the spatial resolution is still far from enough for the structural reconstruction of biomolecules in vivo (i.e., ~24 nm thickness of microtubule fiber). In this study, a deep learning network named A-net was developed and shows that the resolution of cytoskeleton images captured by a confocal microscope c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this Special Issue, we are glad to collect 15 research articles covering a broad area, including optical field modulation [ 11 ], laser fabrication techniques [ 12 , 13 ], optical measurement [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], on-chip photonic devices [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], super-resolution imaging [ 23 , 24 ], and related theoretical [ 25 ] investigations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this Special Issue, we are glad to collect 15 research articles covering a broad area, including optical field modulation [ 11 ], laser fabrication techniques [ 12 , 13 ], optical measurement [ 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 ], on-chip photonic devices [ 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ], super-resolution imaging [ 23 , 24 ], and related theoretical [ 25 ] investigations.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are another two research articles related directly to super-resolution imaging. One used the traditional method [ 23 ] by combining Lucy–Richardson deconvolution and discrete wavelet methods, and the other one used an A-net deep learning network [ 24 ]. Both show apparent improvement in the spatial resolution and SNR of biological images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%