2014
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.89.083519
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Super-sample covariance in simulations

Abstract: Using separate universe simulations, we accurately quantify super-sample covariance (SSC), the typically dominant sampling error for matter power spectrum estimators in a finite volume, which arises from the presence of super survey modes. By quantifying the power spectrum response to a background mode, this approach automatically captures the separate effects of beat coupling in the quasilinear regime, halo sample variance in the nonlinear regime and a new dilation effect which changes scales in the power spe… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
409
3

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 223 publications
(423 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
11
409
3
Order By: Relevance
“…This alternative physical picture allows for a direct and self-consistent simulation of this situation using standard cosmological N-body codes. Previously, this approach was worked out to the lowest order in δL0 (McDonald 2003;Sirko 2005;Li et al 2014) and used to compute the linear response function of the power spectrum (Li et al 2014). Here, we extended the separate universe approach to all orders in the overdensity δL0 and also pointed out the validity of the approach for certain DE models beyond ΛCDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…This alternative physical picture allows for a direct and self-consistent simulation of this situation using standard cosmological N-body codes. Previously, this approach was worked out to the lowest order in δL0 (McDonald 2003;Sirko 2005;Li et al 2014) and used to compute the linear response function of the power spectrum (Li et al 2014). Here, we extended the separate universe approach to all orders in the overdensity δL0 and also pointed out the validity of the approach for certain DE models beyond ΛCDM.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to reduce the sample variance when comparing simulations with different overdensities δL0, it is desirable that the simulations start from the same realization of the initial density field. However, there are two options in doing this (Li et al 2014): Either the random fluctuations coincide on comoving scales at all times or the random fluctuations coincide on physical scales at only one specific time. In the former case one setsL/h = L/h, while in the latter one requires a(tout)L/h = a(tout)L/h, which implies that for each output time tout a different value forL is needed (when keeping L fixed) and hence a new simulation has to be performed.…”
Section: N-body Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We hypothesise that this arises due to the absence of modes larger than the unreplicated box size, which would otherwise couple with the small scale modes within the simulation and increase the small scale covariance. This coupling is referred to as the Super-Sample covariance by Takada & Hu (2013) and Li et al (2014), who also explore corrections for this effect that could be applied to replicated simulations.…”
Section: Effects Of Replication On the Covariancementioning
confidence: 99%