1995
DOI: 10.2307/2275766
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superatomic Boolean algebras constructed from morasses

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. Association for Symbolic Logic is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Journal of Symbolic Logic.Abstract. By using the notion of a simplifi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…If κ and λ are cardinals, then ℘κ(λ) = {X ⊆ λ : |X| < κ}. 2 Formally, in the original terminology of [59] and [58] a (κ, κ + )-cardinal is a neat simplified (κ, 1)-morass, however in many following papers e.g., [36], [22], [16] a (κ, 1)-morass is what formally Velleman called an expanded neat simplified morass. This shift towards the expanded version (already present in the above papers of Velleman) is justified by the fact that the above authors do all the calculations with the expanded versions i.e., use maps rather than sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If κ and λ are cardinals, then ℘κ(λ) = {X ⊆ λ : |X| < κ}. 2 Formally, in the original terminology of [59] and [58] a (κ, κ + )-cardinal is a neat simplified (κ, 1)-morass, however in many following papers e.g., [36], [22], [16] a (κ, 1)-morass is what formally Velleman called an expanded neat simplified morass. This shift towards the expanded version (already present in the above papers of Velleman) is justified by the fact that the above authors do all the calculations with the expanded versions i.e., use maps rather than sets.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, the heart of the philosophy of (κ, κ + )-cardinals is to view κ + as built from fragments of sizes less than κ so that a recursive construction of a structure of size κ + does not have to deal with the case of an intermediate construction having size κ. As the main example we propose a direct construction of a κ-thin tall Boolean algebra due to Koepke and Martinez [22], instead of using the morass version of Martin's axiom developed by Velleman in [58] and [59]. In a sense the claim of this section is that we can do very well without this version of Martin's axiom, if we represent appropriately the intermediate structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interested reader will find a list of consistency results on this type of cardinal sequences in [5,8,9] and in the survey paper [11]. However, no general consistency result is known for this type of cardinal sequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on the case of κ = ω because it is the most interesting and also because we would like to avoid discussing here constructions that require additional set-theoretic assumptions. For example, the only known constructions of commutative κ-thin-tall algebras for κ > ω use such assumptions ( [38]) and for κ-short-wide algebras, it is known that such assumptions are necessary (Theorem 3.4 of [3]). Also it is known that already the existence of a thin-very tall commutative C * -algebra is independent of the usual axioms ( [37,4]).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%