2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2202.05685
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SuperCon: Supervised Contrastive Learning for Imbalanced Skin Lesion Classification

Abstract: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) have achieved great success in skin lesion classification. A balanced dataset is required to train a good model. However, due to the appearance of different skin lesions in practice, severe or even deadliest skin lesion types (e.g., melanoma) naturally have quite small amount represented in a dataset. In that, classification performance degradation occurs widely, it is significantly important to have CNNs that work well on class imbalanced skin lesion image dataset. In this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Marrakchi et al [ 12 ] and Chen et al [ 13 ] independently adopted supervised CL to combat class imbalance in the medical domain. They both used a two-stage architecture consisting of (1) feature learning using CL, followed by (2) fine-tuning using classification loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Marrakchi et al [ 12 ] and Chen et al [ 13 ] independently adopted supervised CL to combat class imbalance in the medical domain. They both used a two-stage architecture consisting of (1) feature learning using CL, followed by (2) fine-tuning using classification loss.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the architecture of the model in which the contrastive losses are implemented is explained. Our proposed asymmetric loss function is novel, while the architecture is obtained from [ 12 , 13 ] with no changes made. Thus, our contribution lies simply in the change of the loss function.…”
Section: Proposed Loss Functions and Architecturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations