2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.116.011301
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconducting Detectors for Superlight Dark Matter

Abstract: We propose and study a new class of of superconducting detectors which are sensitive to O(meV) electron recoils from dark matter-electron scattering. Such devices could detect dark matter as light as the warm dark matter limit, mX ∼ > 1 keV. We compute the rate of dark matter scattering off of free electrons in a (superconducting) metal, including the relevant Pauli blocking factors. We demonstrate that classes of dark matter consistent with terrestrial and cosmological/astrophysical constraints could be detec… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
260
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 259 publications
(261 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
260
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper we further develop the proposal laid out in ref. [23], where superconductors were considered for accessing DM energy deposits on electrons as low as a milli-eV, translating to sensitivity to DM with mass as low as m X ∼ keV. Cosmologically, the keV mass scale is significant because it corresponds to the lower bound on the DM mass from the Lyman-α forest [24] and phase space packing [25,26]; lighter (fermionic and thermalized) DM is inconsistent with cosmological observations (though see ref.…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)057mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper we further develop the proposal laid out in ref. [23], where superconductors were considered for accessing DM energy deposits on electrons as low as a milli-eV, translating to sensitivity to DM with mass as low as m X ∼ keV. Cosmologically, the keV mass scale is significant because it corresponds to the lower bound on the DM mass from the Lyman-α forest [24] and phase space packing [25,26]; lighter (fermionic and thermalized) DM is inconsistent with cosmological observations (though see ref.…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)057mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…constraints may be lifted, however, for instance via having the coupling g e vary with environment, or via trapping effects, in which case sizable direct detection cross sections can be accommodated [79]. A kinetically mixed vector mediator can also lift stellar constraints, as will be discussed in section 5.2.2.…”
Section: Jhep08(2016)057mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We will also apply our results to the DAMIC bounds discussed in [12] derived from an engineering run of DAMIC [14]. Additional possible methods for detecting sub-GeV DM include superconductors [15,16], superfluid helium [17,18], as well as a search tactic employing conventional DM detectors wherein a detectable photon is emitted from the scattered nucleus [19].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%