Superconducting Magnet Models for Isabelle

Dahl, P.; Damm, Ralf; Jacobus, David D.; Lasky, C.; McInturff, A.D.; Morgan, G.; Parzen, G.; Sampson, W.

doi:10.1109/tns.1973.4327216

“…The tipping point had been reached and the 1970's observed the launch of a large number of accelerator projects based on superconducting magnets and a growing R&D community. A new confidence in the collider approach based on the success of SPEAR at SLAC [12] and the Intersecting Storage Ring (ISR) at CERN along with the progress in superconducting technology led to ISABELLE at Brookhaven [13,14], a 400 GeV proton collider, that was approved in 1977. The project suffered due to both scientific and political factors as well as problems with the 5 T superconducting magnets.…”

Section: Superconducting Magnets For Particle Acceleratorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…3, mainly differed from those at the Tevatron because of the use of a cold iron yoke, and an outer shell that provided helium leak tightness. A cold iron concept had been developed earlier at ISABELLE [14], the initial competitor of the Tevatron. This concept greatly simplified the alignment and geometry of the coil, at the expense of a much larger cold mass but had to accommodate the differential thermal contraction between the outer stainless-steel shell, the iron yoke, the aluminum collars and the composite copper/Nb-Ti/insulation coil.…”

Section: ) the Beginning: Tevatronmentioning

confidence: 99%

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Rossi

¹

,

Bottura

²

2013

Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Superconductivity has been the most influential technology in the field of accelerators in the last 30 years. Since the commissioning of the Tevatron, which demonstrated the use and operability of superconductivity on a large scale, superconducting magnets and rf cavities have been at the heart of all new large accelerators. Superconducting magnets have been the invariable choice for large colliders, as well as cyclotrons and large synchrotrons. In spite of the long history of success, superconductivity remains a difficult technology, requires adequate R&D and suitable preparation, and has a relatively high cost. Hence, it is not surprising that the development has also been marked by a few setbacks.This article is a review of the main superconducting accelerator magnet projects; it highlights the main characteristics and main achievements, and gives a perspective on the development of superconducting magnets for the future generation of very high energy colliders.To be published in Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology, Vol. 5Geneva, Switzerland CERN-ATS-2013-019February 2013 Superconductivity has been the most influential technology in the field of accelerators in the last 30 years. Since the commissioning of the Tevatron, which demonstrated the use and operability of superconductivity on a large scale, superconducting magnets and rf cavities have been at the heart of all new large accelerators. Superconducting magnets have been the invariable choice for large colliders, as well as cyclotrons and large synchrotrons. In spite of the long history of success, superconductivity remains a difficult technology, requires adequate R&D and suitable preparation, and has a relatively high cost. Hence, it is not surprising that the development has also been marked by a few setbacks. This article is a review of the main superconducting accelerator magnet projects; it highlights the main characteristics and main achievements, and gives a perspective on the development of superconducting magnets for the future generation of very high energy colliders.

show abstract

“…One brilliant idea of Fermilab scientists was to accelerate the protonantiproton in the same magnet ring (and one beam pipe), saving a second ring: this required a magnet aperture of 75 mm. Even before Fermilab, BNL had engaged in long and fruitful R&D [22], eventually converging to the design of 4 T magnets for Isabelle, later renamed CBA (Colliding Beam Accelerators), a 200 + 200 p-p collider. After a very promising initial success, magnet development for a "better" 400 + 400 GeV accelerator based on 5 T field dipoles took longer than expected, resulting in delays.…”

Section: Tevatron and Isabellementioning

confidence: 99%

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Rossi

¹

,

Bottura

²

2012

Rev. Accl. Sci. Tech.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Superconductivity has been the most influential technology in the field of accelerators in the last 30 years. Since the commissioning of the Tevatron, which demonstrated the use and operability of superconductivity on a large scale, superconducting magnets and rf cavities have been at the heart of all new large accelerators. Superconducting magnets have been the invariable choice for large colliders, as well as cyclotrons and large synchrotrons. In spite of the long history of success, superconductivity remains a difficult technology, requires adequate R&D and suitable preparation, and has a relatively high cost. Hence, it is not surprising that the development has also been marked by a few setbacks.This article is a review of the main superconducting accelerator magnet projects; it highlights the main characteristics and main achievements, and gives a perspective on the development of superconducting magnets for the future generation of very high energy colliders.To be published in Reviews of Accelerator Science and Technology, Vol. 5Geneva, Switzerland CERN-ATS-2013-019February 2013 Superconductivity has been the most influential technology in the field of accelerators in the last 30 years. Since the commissioning of the Tevatron, which demonstrated the use and operability of superconductivity on a large scale, superconducting magnets and rf cavities have been at the heart of all new large accelerators. Superconducting magnets have been the invariable choice for large colliders, as well as cyclotrons and large synchrotrons. In spite of the long history of success, superconductivity remains a difficult technology, requires adequate R&D and suitable preparation, and has a relatively high cost. Hence, it is not surprising that the development has also been marked by a few setbacks. This article is a review of the main superconducting accelerator magnet projects; it highlights the main characteristics and main achievements, and gives a perspective on the development of superconducting magnets for the future generation of very high energy colliders.

show abstract

“…7 The correction windings will be wound flat and then mounted on the cold bora tuba as is dona for the standard lattice quadrupoles. …”

Section: Ql Mechanical Designmentioning

confidence: 99%

ISABELLE Insertion Quadrupoles

Kaugerts¹,

Polk²,

Sampson³

et al. 1979

IEEE Trans. Nucl. Sci.

Self Cite

0

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Beaa focussing and control at tha bean lntarsestion regions of ISABELLE it accomplished by a number of superconducting insertion quadrupoles. These magnets differ fron the standard ISABELLE quadrupoles in various ways. In particular, the requirements of Halted space near the intersections and aperture for bssa extraction impose constraints on their configuration. To achieve options) beaa focussing and provide tuning flexibility cells for stronger quadrupole tria windings than those in the standard quadrupoles. The magnetic and mechanical design of the Insertion qutfdrupolcs »od their associated correction and steering windings to accomplish the above tasks is presented.

show abstract

Superconducting Magnet Models for Isabelle

Cited by 14 publications

References 3 publications

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

Superconducting Magnets for Particle Accelerators

ISABELLE Insertion Quadrupoles

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About