2020
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.102.125125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconducting pairing symmetries of the Hubbard model on the honeycomb lattice with inhomogeneous hopping strength

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Though U = 8 is argued to be optimal for the superconducting pairing on the Hubbard square lattice, the severe sign problem at strong interaction strength is a big obstacle. On the other hand, the qualitative evolution of the superconducting pairing is not sensitive to the interaction strength, as being proven previously in the Hubbard model on different lattice geometries [49][50][51], and can also be seen in this study. The electron density is chosen to be ρ = 0.875, corresponding to the hole doping δ = 1/8 which is argued to be optimal for the superconductivity [52], another density ρ = 0.917 is also studied for comparison.…”
Section: Model and Methodologysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Though U = 8 is argued to be optimal for the superconducting pairing on the Hubbard square lattice, the severe sign problem at strong interaction strength is a big obstacle. On the other hand, the qualitative evolution of the superconducting pairing is not sensitive to the interaction strength, as being proven previously in the Hubbard model on different lattice geometries [49][50][51], and can also be seen in this study. The electron density is chosen to be ρ = 0.875, corresponding to the hole doping δ = 1/8 which is argued to be optimal for the superconductivity [52], another density ρ = 0.917 is also studied for comparison.…”
Section: Model and Methodologysupporting
confidence: 85%
“…Qualitatively, the results for U = 2 agree well with those for U = 4, as can be compared with figures and 5. This suggests that, similar to the half-filled homogeneous Hubbard model [20,[60][61][62], the physics of doping Hubbard model with NNN hopping is not highly sensitive to the interaction strength U, though the ground state may no longer be an AFM insulator, but with the competition of the FM order. In this way, one may also expect our conclusion is applicable to the strong U limit.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%