2002
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.65.195121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconductivity and charge-density waves in a quasi-one-dimensional spin-gap system

Abstract: We consider a model of spin-gapped chains weakly coupled by Josephson and Coulomb interactions. Combining such non-perturbative methods as bosonization and Bethe ansatz to treat the intra-chain interactions with the Random Phase Approximation for the inter-chain couplings and the first corrections to this, we investigate the phase diagram of this model. The phase diagram shows both charge density wave ordering and superconductivity. These phases are separated by line of critical points which exhibits an approx… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
60
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
60
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We first review the uniform configuration of the Ising variable (and also the paramagnetic phase of the Ising variable), in which the SC operator will develop the same expectation value for all the LE systems 38,49 . For the staggered (period 2) Ising configuration, there are two phases, depending on the sign of δJ , a uniform SC state and a PDW state.…”
Section: A Uniform Sc and Period 2 Pdw Sc Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We first review the uniform configuration of the Ising variable (and also the paramagnetic phase of the Ising variable), in which the SC operator will develop the same expectation value for all the LE systems 38,49 . For the staggered (period 2) Ising configuration, there are two phases, depending on the sign of δJ , a uniform SC state and a PDW state.…”
Section: A Uniform Sc and Period 2 Pdw Sc Phasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[31][32][33] We will follow a dimensional crossover approach that has been used with considerable success by several authors. [34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41] We will consider a generalization of the model used by Granath and coworkers 36 in which there are two types of 1D subsystems: a set of doped two-leg ladders in the Luther-Emery (LE) liquid regime (which has a single gapless charge sector and a gapped spin sector) and a set of 1D electronic Luttinger liquids (eLL) with both a gapless charge sector and a gapless spin sector. Although the interactions between LE liquids and between LE and eLL liquids will be treated by the interchain mean field theory (MFT) (see, e.g.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SO͑4͒ isospin invariance has been discussed in quasi one-dimensional systems with highly anisotropic spin interactions. 51,52 The ⌰ r operators in Eq. (6) operators define different symmetry groups and apply to different systems.…”
Section: A So"3… ã So"4… Symmetry At Incommensurate Fillingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(11) given above using the RPA method in turn. Beginning with the coupling t ⊥ , this method involves computing the dynamical spin susceptibility χ of the coupled system in the disordered phase as (17) in terms of the frequency ω, the longitudinal and transverse wave-vectors k and k ⊥ respectively. χ 1D is the dynamical spin susceptibility of a single TFIM system, to be calculated assuming incipient order along the τ x direction in pseudospin space…”
Section: Coupled Tfim Systems: Quantum Criticality Dimensional mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another interest is to investigate the conditions under which short-coherence length superconductivity can arise by hole-doping a charge-and antiferromagnetically ordered Mott insulator. Again, this issue has been studied in sufficient detail only in the weak coupling limit 17 . Motivated by the above discussion, we have recently studied a problem of coupled electronic chains 12 , where each chain is described by an extended Hubbard model with a hopping term (of strength, t) and nearest-(V 1 ) and next-nearest neighbor (nnn) (V 2 ) Coulomb interactions in addition to the local, Hubbard (U ) interaction 12 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%