2001
DOI: 10.1070/1063-7869/44/10s/s14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconductivity in molecular wires

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
1
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 65 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
73
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the earlier work on the conductance of single DNA molecules has delivered contradicting results, ranging from metallic to insulating behaviour [4][5][6][7] . Experiments were performed on single DNA molecules suspended between electrodes or on bundles of DNA, and under various conditions.…”
Section: Dna Conductance Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the earlier work on the conductance of single DNA molecules has delivered contradicting results, ranging from metallic to insulating behaviour [4][5][6][7] . Experiments were performed on single DNA molecules suspended between electrodes or on bundles of DNA, and under various conditions.…”
Section: Dna Conductance Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the CT in DNA oligomers has been extensively studied both experimentally and theoretically with many techniques. Experiments have initially yielded different results, such as DNA being a conductor, 4 semiconductor, 5 and insulator. 6 Also the theoretical understanding has been divergent and results in two points of view.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…76,120,121 Thus, the probes were not entirely responsible for the formation of conductive paths on the surfaces of AuNPs. Opening bridge hybridization also occurred between adjacent AuNPs; therefore, the altered conductivity can be explained not only by the molecular conductivity of DNA, 71,76,[120][121][122]124,125 but also by the reduced structural distance between the 46 nm parent particles with attached 12 nm probes owing to this bridging by hybridization. The binder decanedithiol (~1.3 nm) was used to attach child AuNPs (12 nm), which were arrowed in the TEM image (Fig.…”
Section: Nanogap Electrodementioning
confidence: 99%