2021
DOI: 10.1088/1361-648x/abd99c
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superconductivity in topological insulator β-PdBi2 under pressure

Abstract: The topological insulator PdBi2 exhibits two different crystal phases at ambient pressure, i.e., ‘α-PdBi2’ and ‘ -PdBi2’. The pressure dependence of crystal structure and superconductivity of α-PdBi2 has been fully elucidated thus far. However, the physical properties of β-PdBi2 crystals under pressure have not been sufficiently investigated. In this study, we fully investigate the crystal structure and superconductivity of β-PdBi2 under pressure based on synchrotron x-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns. The tem… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The plots of M / H – T of Pd 1– x Pt x Bi 2 (nominal x = 0.2) at zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) are shown in Figure b, which demonstrate the superconducting transition with a T c value of 4.35 K and an onset transition temperature ( T c onset ) of 4.85 K. The T c value was different from that of α-PdBi 2 (1.6–1.7 K) , but similar to that of β-PdBi 2 (4.1–5.4 K). The shielding fraction at 2.0 K was determined to be 37%, the value of which was assigned to the fraction of the β phase of Pd 1– x Pt x Bi 2 (nominal x = 0.2) because of no observation of diamagnetic signals due to the α phase down to 2.0 K, as seen in Figure b. The EDX spectrum exhibited peaks corresponding to Pd, Pt, and Bi only (not shown), indicating the stoichiometry of Pd 0.88(6) Pt 0.12(6) Bi 2.2(2) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The plots of M / H – T of Pd 1– x Pt x Bi 2 (nominal x = 0.2) at zero-field cooling (ZFC) and field cooling (FC) are shown in Figure b, which demonstrate the superconducting transition with a T c value of 4.35 K and an onset transition temperature ( T c onset ) of 4.85 K. The T c value was different from that of α-PdBi 2 (1.6–1.7 K) , but similar to that of β-PdBi 2 (4.1–5.4 K). The shielding fraction at 2.0 K was determined to be 37%, the value of which was assigned to the fraction of the β phase of Pd 1– x Pt x Bi 2 (nominal x = 0.2) because of no observation of diamagnetic signals due to the α phase down to 2.0 K, as seen in Figure b. The EDX spectrum exhibited peaks corresponding to Pd, Pt, and Bi only (not shown), indicating the stoichiometry of Pd 0.88(6) Pt 0.12(6) Bi 2.2(2) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The lattice constants a and c obtained were 3.3568(2) Å and 13.211(3) Å, respectively, for the tetragonal phase (β phase) of Pd 0.88(6) Pt 0.12(6) Bi 2.2(2) . The lattice constants of the α phase of Pd 0.88(6) Pt 0.12(6) Bi 2.2(2) were also similar to those of α-PdBi 2 ( a = 12.74 Å, b = 4.25 Å, c = 5.665 Å, and β = 102.58°), whereas the lattice constants of the β phase were similar to those of β-PdBi 2 ( a = 3.3503(4) Å and c = 12.923(2) Å) . The lattice constants of Pd 0.88(6) Pt 0.12(6) Bi 2.2(2) were slightly larger than those of PdBi 2 because the ionic radius of Pt 2+ (0.94 Å for six coordination) was also slightly larger than that of Pd 2+ (0.86 Å for six coordination) .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…By contrast, the RbBi 2 samples showed an almost constant T c onset -p behavior, similar to KBi 2 . The constant or slight increase in T c onset for KBi 2 and RbBi 2 against pressure is remarkable, that is, the observed robustness of T c onset against pressure is common for Bi-based compounds, such as BaBi 3 and PdBi 2 , 37,48 indicating unconventional electronic structures, such as the Fermi surface consisting of multiple orbitals or strong SOC of Bi. The temperature dependence of the reduced critical field of KBi 2 and RbBi 2 under pressure suggests a deviation from the swave dirty limit model for the Cooper pair symmetry.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%