2001
DOI: 10.1029/2001jd900195
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical channel flow in the coastal atmospheric boundary layer: Idealized numerical simulations

Abstract: Abstract. Numerical simulations of supercritical coastal flows were performed with a threedimensional, nonlinear, hydrostatic meso-?-scale model with a higher-order turbulence closure. The purpose was to resolve questions from previous studies related to terrain forcing. Idealized terrain, representing northern California, was used; this facilitated testing of hypotheses in a simple fashion. It was found that the angle by which the coast tums away from the flow regulates the acceleration in the expansion fan a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This effect in the wind direction is nevertheless, in the present case-study, noticeable south of Cabo de S. Vicente. The same kind of flow over-running over low terrain during CLLJ events, near Cape Mendocino in California, was also described by So¨derberg and Tjernstro¨m (2001). The analysis of this case-study showed that the algorithm developed by Ranjha et al (2013), applied to the downscaled data set seems to be appropriate to filter CLLJ occurrences off the coasts of the Iberian Peninsula.…”
Section: Coastal Low-level Jet Climatologymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…This effect in the wind direction is nevertheless, in the present case-study, noticeable south of Cabo de S. Vicente. The same kind of flow over-running over low terrain during CLLJ events, near Cape Mendocino in California, was also described by So¨derberg and Tjernstro¨m (2001). The analysis of this case-study showed that the algorithm developed by Ranjha et al (2013), applied to the downscaled data set seems to be appropriate to filter CLLJ occurrences off the coasts of the Iberian Peninsula.…”
Section: Coastal Low-level Jet Climatologymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The model is well documented and has been used in a variety of applications including orographic flows (Enger et al, 1993;Grisogono 1995;Enger and Grisogono, 1998) and coastal flows Grisogono and Tjernström, 1996;Sundararajan and Tjernström, 2000). It has been used in a number of studies based on the CW96 experiment (Tjernström, 1999;Tjernström and Grisogono, 2000;and Söderberg and Tjernström, 2001) as well as more general studies of US West Coast flow (Cui et al, 1998;Söderberg and Tjernström, 2002).…”
Section: Model Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven research flights were made by the National Centre for Atmospheric Research C-130 Hercules during June and early July 1996. An overview is given by Rogers et al (1998) and results have been presented in an extensive series of publications (Burk et al, 1999;Tjernström, 1999, Ström, 1999Dorman et al, 1999;Dorman and Winant, 2000;Tjernström and Grisogono, 2000;Edwards et al, 2001;Haack et al, 2001;Brooks, 2001;Söderberg and Tjernström, 2001). To date the analysis of aircraft data from CW96 and associated modelling studies have focused on the mesoscale dynamics and variability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The identification of BL depth from the location of the maximum in W f (a, b) works well where background gradients are negligible and the transition zone sharp and well defined, but these conditions are frequently not met. Under stable conditions, where mixing is poor, vertical gradients are common both within and above the BL, and the inversion layer may be a significant fraction of the depth of the BL as a whole (Söderberg and Tjernström 2001); here the problem of identifying the BL depth in an automated manner becomes more complicated. It should also be noted that under some conditions the boundary layer may be so ill-defined that a absolute top cannot sensibly be defined.…”
Section: The Wavelet Covariance Transformmentioning
confidence: 99%