1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0021-9673(98)00906-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Supercritical fluid extraction of flavonoids from Scutellariae Radix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
59
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
5
59
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fig.1 shows an increase of ethanol percentage up to 50% resulted in an increase of flavonoids recovery. This was consistent with the results of Lin et al(1999) that under certain temperature and pressure, the higher the percentage of modifiers, the higher was the extraction yield achieved. However, ethanol above 50% exhibited a tremendous drop in flavonoids yield.…”
Section: Effect Of the Amount Of Ethanol Added On The Yield Of Flavonsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Fig.1 shows an increase of ethanol percentage up to 50% resulted in an increase of flavonoids recovery. This was consistent with the results of Lin et al(1999) that under certain temperature and pressure, the higher the percentage of modifiers, the higher was the extraction yield achieved. However, ethanol above 50% exhibited a tremendous drop in flavonoids yield.…”
Section: Effect Of the Amount Of Ethanol Added On The Yield Of Flavonsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Higher content of flavonoids in seaweeds were also reported from other places [24][25] . The flavonoid content of Ulva lactuca and Sargassum whitii and Enteromorpha spirulina was reported to be relatively low.…”
Section: Fig 5: Hplc Chromatogram Of Ethanolic Extract Of Gc Spiked supporting
confidence: 73%
“…The solvating power of a supercritical fluid is varied and extraction efficiency is markedly improved by controlling the pressure or by adding organic modifiers, such as methanol. In the SFE of flavonoids from Scutellaria radix, Lin et al observed that, for 1 g of sample, adding 3 mL of 70% methanol in 20 mL of CO 2 gave much better extraction than pure methanol [62]. This might be because 30% of water would further increase the polarity of the modifier, and polar constituents would thus be extracted more easily.…”
Section: Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%