2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-662-04619-7_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superdirective Microphone Arrays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
122
0
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 182 publications
(123 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
122
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We employed a superdirective design assuming an uncorrelated noise with a power of -30 dB [7]. Here, no near-end speaker was considered, since double talk detection (DTD) schemes can easily be incorporated into the new approach by modifying µ 0 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employed a superdirective design assuming an uncorrelated noise with a power of -30 dB [7]. Here, no near-end speaker was considered, since double talk detection (DTD) schemes can easily be incorporated into the new approach by modifying µ 0 .…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To validate the effectiveness of the proposed post-filter estimation method, we compare its performance to other multi-channel noise reduction techniques, including the MVDR beamformer [18], the generalized Zelinski post-filter [7] and the McCowan post-filter [11], under the assumption of a diffuse noise field. In addition, we provide comparisons with the noise reduction results obtained by using at the output of the MVDR beamformer the "decision directed" Frequency (in Hz) Directivity Factor (dB) Fig.…”
Section: Experiments and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight vector W H emerging from the solution of this constrained minimization problem, corresponds to the MVDR or superdirective beamformer and is given by [18,19] …”
Section: Mvdr Beamformermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fixed noise-field characteristic is coded in the coherence matrix ΓNN[m] which additionally influences beamformer properties directivity and susceptibility to white noise, and therefore has to be constrained [4,1]. Both, d[m, Θ] and ΓNN[m] depend on to the assumed wave propagation model which may differ from the true (and generally unknown) wave propagation from the source to the microphones.…”
Section: Signal Model and Binaural Multi-channel Noise Reductionmentioning
confidence: 99%