2020
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.0c04709
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Superelastic, Sensitive, and Low Hysteresis Flexible Strain Sensor Based on Wave-Patterned Liquid Metal for Human Activity Monitoring

Abstract: Flexible strain sensors have been widely used in wearable electronic devices for body physical parameter capturing. However, regardless of the stretchability of the sensing material, the resolution of small strain changes or the hysteresis between loading/unloading states has always limited the various applications of these sensors. In this paper, a microfluidic flexible strain sensor was achieved by introducing liquid metal eutectic gallium indium (EGaIn) embedded into a wave-shaped microchannel elastomeric m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
181
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 187 publications
(181 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
0
181
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The combination of these two cracking strategies contributed to a much improved sensor performance. Compared with previously reported liquid metal‐based counterparts (Figure 1f; Table S2, Supporting Information), [ 17,29,35–40 ] this sensor design resulted in two orders of magnitude of sensitivity amplification in term of maximum and overall gauge factor ( GF , Note 1, Supporting Information), while maintaining a wide working range (>85%). As shown in Figure 1g, to our knowledge, this is the first liquid metal‐based sensor that rivals the state‐of‐art counterparts on sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The combination of these two cracking strategies contributed to a much improved sensor performance. Compared with previously reported liquid metal‐based counterparts (Figure 1f; Table S2, Supporting Information), [ 17,29,35–40 ] this sensor design resulted in two orders of magnitude of sensitivity amplification in term of maximum and overall gauge factor ( GF , Note 1, Supporting Information), while maintaining a wide working range (>85%). As shown in Figure 1g, to our knowledge, this is the first liquid metal‐based sensor that rivals the state‐of‐art counterparts on sensitivity.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…Working range can be regulated by adjusting liquid metal pattern configurations. f,g) Compared with previous liquid metal‐based counterparts, [ 17,29,35–40 ] the proposed sensor improves the sensitivity by two orders of magnitude. By this improvement, liquid metal‐based sensors rival the state‐of‐art counterparts.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The fabricate of flexible sensors requires the sensor itself to be flexible, stretchable, and ductile and the substrates and circuits on which it depends. Specific stretch and stretch characteristics to adapt to the adhesion on the human body surface, common flexible substrates are usually processed into a film, such as polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) [ 17 20 ], polyimide (PI) [ 21 , 22 ], polyurethane (PU) [ 23 ], polyethylene terephthalate (PET) [ 24 , 25 ], polyvinyl alcohol(PVA) [ 26 ], polyvinyl butyral(PVB) [ 27 ], paper [ 28 , 29 ], silicone rubber [ 5 , 30 , 31 ], and more skin-friendly biodegradable materials can also be used, such as pectin [ 32 ], cotton, silk [ 33 ], and other cellulose materials [ 34 , 35 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Progress in the development of soft and conformable strain sensors has used conductive materials including metal nanowires ( Amjadi et al., 2014 ; Gong et al, 2015 ), carbon nanotubes ( Ryu et al., ; Yamada et al., 2011 ), metal films ( Filiatrault et al., 2015 ), graphene ( Li et al., 2016 ; Wang et al., 2014 ), liquid metal ( Chen et al., 2020 ; Gao et al., 2019 ; Li and Lee, 2017 ), and ionic liquid ( Choi et al., 2017 ; Chossat et al, 2015 ; Zhang et al., 2017 ) on stretchable substrates such as siloxane elastomers ( Ryu et al., ; Wang et al., 2018 ), latex ( Gong et al, 2015 ), and polyurethane ( Ding et al., 2016 ; Jeon et al., 2017 ). Strain sensors can employ resistive, capacitive, or optical sensing mechanisms, where a change in one of these properties can be correlated to strain ( Souri et al., 2020 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%